Now tell us "how" you are trading.
Thanks
Hello Mr. 888You are using 2:1 risk /reward in this trade, e.g. risk 33 tick to make 18 ticks.
To prove it is statically significant that you have edge, you need to show that you can win at least 7 times out of 10 trade, this trade turn out to be winner but statistically it has ~65% of winning, not much surprise.
Noted. My mistakeHello Mr. 888
Though I like you, I must beg to differ. The numbers you stated concerning trade17 are incorrect. The profit was 27 ticks not 18. The trade was entered at 61. Though I tried to get it at 58. Hence the 88 and 28 pt and sl. View attachment 171848

Honestly. That is not the strategy I applied on trade 18. And do they not pay money for winning trades during the Asia/Europe markets? Truth is...I miscalculated my entry on trade18. The entry was too early. Period. As you may note I came back a little later going long again. Only 19 points lower than the entry of trade18. And furthermore, I came out of trade 19 early because I was unable to watch it anymore at the time. Since you like trading in hindsight, the market had a high of 928 or so. All right after I excited the trade. Meaning if I had stayed in I would have picked up at least 20 more ticks. But all that means nothing. It's about what a trader does. Not his intent. Or what could, would, or should of happened. They don't add money to your bottom line for those things.You obviously using the strategy that try to scalp during pull-back in trendy market.
The market is not trending when you enter trade 18, Asia/Europe market should not be counted in your evaluation as they just tiny followers from US market without own live.
Honestly. That is not the strategy I applied on trade 18. And do they not pay money for winning trades during the Asia/Europe markets? Truth is...I miscalculated my entry on trade18. The entry was too early. Period. As you may note I came back a little later going long again. Only 19 points lower than the entry of trade18. And furthermore, I came out of trade 19 early because I was unable to watch it anymore at the time. Since you like trading in hindsight, the market had a high of 928 or so. All right after I excited the trade. Meaning if I had stayed in I would have picked up at least 20 more ticks. But all that means nothing. It's about what a trader does. Not his intent. Or what could, would, or should of happened. They don't add money to your bottom line for those things.
I am not your fool mr. Scalper. Nor have I ask you or anyone here for money.Well you should have.
Silly things like this has cost a lot of inexperienced people money, thinking they can follow some fool on an internet site making "market calls".
I am the protector of the inexperienced and the vulnerable, and I do not have much time for people who clearly demonstrate that they know very little about trading with real money.
Do not expect any easy replies from me, unless of course you know what you are doing.
I have encountered several highly knowledgeable traders at ET. And learned a lot. You mr Scalper may be a brilliant trader. Though I doubt it. Your post make you sound silly. Protector of the inexperienced and vulnerable. Really. Are you employed with an oversight agency or association? You come off sounding like fool.Well you should have.
Silly things like this has cost a lot of inexperienced people money, thinking they can follow some fool on an internet site making "market calls".
I am the protector of the inexperienced and the vulnerable, and I do not have much time for people who clearly demonstrate that they know very little about trading with real money.
Do not expect any easy replies from me, unless of course you know what you are doing.
With all due respect...you are a joke sir. You sound like a bitter trader who has never been really good at trading at all. Have a good eveningThis guy is a BS snake oil vendor posting fake trades, i busted this all his on Nadex thread, none of his posted calls were on the official Nadex time and sales.
Dont believe any of the BS calls he posted on this thread, they are all easy to fake.