You got me looking at the YM chart. I can say this:
Michael B.
P.S. Now with this in mind, assuming you agree, how would you apply this to the equations?
P.S.S. We really do not care much about # of points or direction just now. We need to agree on some simple truths. Without knowing the points or direction we can still set the stack of alternating, reversing levels accordingly. Actually, because of PSM we really only care about the consecutive losses caused by incorrectly setting the equations. I find intraday movements impossible to predict and the "kick-off" of a direction is random I believe (notice I do not say that price action is random, there are trends existing, and I believe in them)
- The "more narrow" the previous day is the more probable today will be "less narrow" (notice I do not say by how much).
- The "more wider" the previous day is the more probable today will be "less wider" (notice I do not say by how much).
Michael B.
P.S. Now with this in mind, assuming you agree, how would you apply this to the equations?
P.S.S. We really do not care much about # of points or direction just now. We need to agree on some simple truths. Without knowing the points or direction we can still set the stack of alternating, reversing levels accordingly. Actually, because of PSM we really only care about the consecutive losses caused by incorrectly setting the equations. I find intraday movements impossible to predict and the "kick-off" of a direction is random I believe (notice I do not say that price action is random, there are trends existing, and I believe in them)
Quote from sunnyskies:
I know all that stuff about NR4 and NR7 days... the problem is that fairly often these narrow range days are followed by outside days with whipping action on both side's of yesterday's range. And it happens rather often and I havent found a way around it so I dont buy into the NR7 mantra.
