Yet another reason why Debbie Wasserman needs to be waterboarded

Tony Stark and exGOPer are very quiet on this one.


Debbie Wasserman nor Hillary Clinton will be our nominee in 2020.If Debbie Wasserman or Hillary Clinton broke the law let justice be served.I don't speak for ExGOPer but as long as our 2020 nominee isn't connected to it I couldn't care less.
 
Tony Stark and exGOPer are very quiet on this one.


It's the DNC that is being quiet. Once the DNC get's its spin together they send out the talking points to their assigned robo-posters such as the one/s we have here and then the kool-aid flows freely. But yeh, let's have a little compassion for them in this little interlude. Probably by tomorrow the Mothership circling the Hale-Bopp Comet will beam down some talking points.
 
First AP Story on Arrested Dem IT
Staffer Makes Schultz Look Like
the Victim

NewsBusters, by Tom Blumer
Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 7/26/2017 11:41:24 PM Post Reply
Just before noon, the Associated Press ended almost 18 hours of silence on the arrest of IT staffer Imran Awan yesterday as he was attempting to leave the country. The report spun the news in the most favorable way it could for beleaguered Democrats, making Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz look like the victim as it headlined her spokesman´s claim that she fired Awan Tuesday after learning of his arrest. The fact is that Schultz has been involved in obstructing investigations into Awan´s activities for months.
 
After the hack job Debbie Wasserman Schultz did to shove Bernie out of the primary and have Hillary "win" the primary -- I am surprised that all the "Bernie" Democrats are not taking very public leadership, after this news, in demanding her removal.

What exactly did she do? Be specific. And where should she be removed from exactly? She beat the Bernie gu comfortably in the primary.
 
FAKE NEWS

Oh no its not.
Here's a link to the .pdf filed with court. But you won't read it.

jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/55-D.E.-55-NOF-E-Mail-6-1-17.pdf

Defense counsel: At 4:54 p.m. today, an individual called our law office from "305-936-5724." See attached photo of the caller I.D. The caller refused to identify himself/herself, but asked my secretary about the Wilding et al. v. DNC et al. lawsuit. My secretary stated that it sounded like the caller was using a voice changer, because the voice sounded robotic and genderless -- along the lines of the voice changers used when television show interviews are kept anonymous. The caller concluded with “Okey dokey,” after my secretary gave the caller public information about the case. After the call ended, a simple Google search of the phone number "305-936-5724" shows that it is the phone number for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Aventura office, https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/contact/. See attached screenshot. What just occurred is highly irregular and we will be filing the instant e-mail with the court forthwith. Regards,
 
Oh no its not.
Here's a link to the .pdf filed with court. But you won't read it.

jampac.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/55-D.E.-55-NOF-E-Mail-6-1-17.pdf

Defense counsel: At 4:54 p.m. today, an individual called our law office from "305-936-5724." See attached photo of the caller I.D. The caller refused to identify himself/herself, but asked my secretary about the Wilding et al. v. DNC et al. lawsuit. My secretary stated that it sounded like the caller was using a voice changer, because the voice sounded robotic and genderless -- along the lines of the voice changers used when television show interviews are kept anonymous. The caller concluded with “Okey dokey,” after my secretary gave the caller public information about the case. After the call ended, a simple Google search of the phone number "305-936-5724" shows that it is the phone number for Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Aventura office, https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/contact/. See attached screenshot. What just occurred is highly irregular and we will be filing the instant e-mail with the court forthwith. Regards,

It's very easy to spoof these kind of calls, means nothing. Also that number is reportedly out of service.
 
We'll need another Special Counsel because the AG is too busy chasing high school kids for smoking weed. He still has the guy at the FBI whose wife received $700k from the Clinton machine.

Considering how quickly they appointed a SC to investigate their own president, you'd think these dolts could get their act together to investigate the democrats.
 
Back
Top