Yes, the last decade saw global cooling, not warming

I have a big issue with the warming crowd, why do only they get to say what should be done?

Assume their projections are true, the cost of simply adapting may be lower than the cost of stopping it. Earth worshippers want to beleive some sort of mystical pristine state exists. I don't trust the warming folks, they are the new home of the america hating communists.
 
Quote from Mav88:

I have a big issue with the warming crowd, why do only they get to say what should be done?

Anybody can make suggestions about what should be done, and in fact the original ideas behind emissions markets were suggested by Republicans.

Assume their projections are true, the cost of simply adapting may be lower than the cost of stopping it. Earth worshippers want to beleive some sort of mystical pristine state exists. I don't trust the warming folks, they are the new home of the america hating communists.

Well that kind of says it all, doesn't it?
 
Quote from CaptainObvious:

"Former Vice President Al Gore told the conference that new data suggests a 75 percent chance the entire Arctic polar ice cap may disappear in the summertime as soon as five to seven years from now."

It's exactly this type hysteria that makes all climate science null and void. If their data shows this, we're on the verge of the end of our world as we know it. Absurd, as there would be other evidence to support this wild eyed claim and there is NONE. Sorry boys, you've been caught in a lie. Start over.

I don't know if Gore is overstating the case or not, but it is very clear that the Arctic ice is disappearing at an alarming rate which is much faster than the most pessimistic IPCC projections:
 

Attachments

Quote from dcraig:

I don't know if Gore is overstating the case or not, but it is very clear that the Arctic ice is disappearing at an alarming rate which is much faster than the most pessimistic IPCC projections:

Good news, more fresh water.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

Anybody can make suggestions about what should be done, and in fact the original ideas behind emissions markets were suggested by Republicans.


If global warming was actually true then it should be encouraged. Far too many places on this planet are way too cold.

After all, what looks more appealing to you?

Tropical-Beach-Poster-C10138968.jpeg


or

blizzard.jpg




The answer is obvious.
 
Quote from dsq:

Hey moron, science never said it was flat it was the church of superstition that insisted it was flat you moron..The church condemned Galilleo and did not admit they were stupidly wrong till the 1990s -almost 400yrs after the fact.You luddites are are delusional.Why do you hate science.
NASA,NOAA all agree gw is happening.

Please show me a peer reviewed showing global warming is wrong.

while this was not directed to me. I note the church changed its mind Galilleos book in the 17th century not the 1990s. (the pope issued an apology in 1990 but that is not when the church changed its mind) . Get your facts straight. Additionally much of science at the time rejected Gallileo's theory because they could not detect the parallax they were looking for.

Finally Galilleo was friends with the Pope at the time at the time of his second hearing - so what most people think happened did not really happen.
 
Back
Top