So long as the benefits are also confined to the "believers."
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Yes, the last decade saw global cooling, not warming
- Thread starter bugscoe
- Start date
So long as the benefits are also confined to the "believers."
Quote from bigdavediode:
One of us is. GISTEMP doesn't control what gets into the GHCN data in the first place. The GIS team has corrected errors many times before (all without a material change in the results) at http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/updates/
The fact that you worked so hard to believe a wordpress blog rather than NASA says that you want to believe something is true at any cost.
Apparently MSNBC hasn't informed you of how NASA has been caught up in the "climategate" scandal.
Don't open your eyes. The truth isn't as pretty as the tingle you're getting up your leg.
Gullible...
Hey, I've got a trading system to sell you! $5 and you can earn $20K every 10 days! And you only need $10 to start!
Quote from bigdavediode:
It sounds like a fair deal, but how will we get the global warming doubters to inhale car exhaust in a mask?
Maybe you guys should start snapping up land that sits above your projected sea-level and is supposed to be temperate?
I mean that IS the logical choice isn't it, if you REALLY BELIEVE your own crap?
Quote from Index piker:
Maybe you guys should start snapping up land that sits above your projected sea-level and is supposed to be temperate?
I mean that IS the logical choice isn't it, if you REALLY BELIEVE your own crap?
There's nothing to believe, the data is available straight from NASA.
Quote from bigdavediode:
There's nothing to believe, the data is available straight from NASA.
What we are seeing is in total contradiction to the scientific method. Honest scientists donât delete their data or use tricks to hide data they donât like. They donât insist the science is settled and that anyone who questions them is a nut. They gladly release their data to other scientists so their results can be replicated or errors can be corrected.
Once upon a time the âscience was settledâ that the world was flat. The âscience was settledâ that the world was the center of the universe. Whoops.
Much of the data used for the âconsensusâ that manmade global warming is real came from the CRU and NASAâs GISS. If that data is not accurate and/or has been manipulated it undermines everything. When you consider the trillions of dollars at risk here by policy pushed by this âscience,â itâs understandable that Christopher Booker is calling it The Worst Scientific Scandal of Our Generation.
Quote from bigdavediode:
And tree rings, ice cores, coral, direct measurements, satellite measurements, gravitational satellite measurements, and isotope measurements.
About that trading system...I refuse to show you how I got the results I did but trust me, the numbers don't lie. You will be rich!