The comments from der_kommissar and Maverick1 are the intellectual equivalent of a plumber pontificating on bridge building and what idiots those mechanical engineers in their ivory towers are with their equations and maths and all that. What I love about the anti-intellectual arguments from those who know next to nothing about what topic at hand is that they start with "You ivory tower types with your statistics, have you even been there/done that" comments. Then, when it turns out you have been there/done that (and often they haven't, actually), they turn to quoting a bunch of economics statistics!
Sig,
Where's your answer to my question?
Your argument above is a straw man. I'm not an anti-intellectual and not anti statistics, if that were so I wouldn't see great value in the Austrian school of economics and would not be citing statistics.
The problem with academia today is that it is characterized mostly by group think, with entire departments favoring political left appointees who keep regurgitating the same wrong ideas. Look, great econometric modeling and all the statistical testing power in the world is worth jack when you are barking up the wrong tree. You have to start with sound thinking and common sense.
And Japan's problems can be fixed without a single econometric paper, because the solution lies in common sense reform and a repudiation of unsound ideas chief of which is the notion that the govt or quasi govt (BoJ/Fed) knows the optimal rate of interest and should set it. Flowing from this religious idea is the idea that 2% inflation per year is "price stability" and absolutely required or else the sky is falling on us and let's print money like there's no tomorrow. Utter nonsense.
You guys are just on the wrong side of history. Looking back some 20 years from now, we'll be saying my goodness how could such poverty of thought by policy makers endure for so long.
Last edited: