Made it more obvious...
I didn't know everybody was using that, or, if so, why. Maybe those who did will see this. Or you could ask them directly.
Made it more obvious...
I didn't know everybody was using that, or, if so, why. Maybe those who did will see this. Or you could ask them directly.
I think they are using it because of this chart...
Ah. That's because your upper limit is too high. If you refer to my chart, the trend begins with the first two points and is extended. Therefore it cuts through the line that you're using as a support.
I guess (what's new) I'm still confused. We start with the channel I posted below formed by choosing the lowest low between our two highs. (I think I got this right).
On the 14th we fall out of this channel, on the 17th we make a new swing low. If we want to use this as our new swing low for our channel shouldn't we also chose the highest two swing highs which forms on the 21st? Is it that this is interacting well with price that we break the rules? At what point do we anchor the bottom of the channel off of the new low? (the 24th)
Thanks for the help.
That's fine, but if you're too rigid, then your mean is meaningless (no pun intended). The purpose of these trendlines and channels is after all to track the stride of price. If your lines are nowhere near what the stride becomes, they have to be changed.
See the following post and posts following (that one was intended): http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showpost.php?p=3941835&postcount=282
Glad you're picking up on TDTDB. It was a good sign that we weren't going lower.
As for your trend channel, keep in mind that few people know how to draw a trendline, much less a channel, largely because they don't know what either are for.
First, they must be drawn from the left. Once they are in, they provide valuable information about overbought and oversold conditions, conditions that most traders miss because they keep expanding their channels to encompass them.
Second, the limits aren't nearly as important as the mean. Fortunately there is a regularity to these limits and to the mean that isn't all that difficult to illustrate. But once you have what you think is the mean, look at how price behaves around it, if it bounces off it, consolidates at it (see, for example, how price behaved when it busted through the mean at 3600 this morning) . If price ignores it entirely, you may have to examine the pauses more carefully to see where the actual mean lies. Once you have that, you can verify the placement of the limits, a completely backwards approach to what's taught.
). My favorite: