Rock,
Your approach to chat room trading is reasonable. And your returns over the past few years are outstanding (you have reduced chat room trading to a science
I do have one question though....you say:
"M/T makes, oh, lets say about 50 round trips per day .... many above my PP and many below my PP,
but very few at a total loss...about 98% winners is my guess...a winner for me is any trade that triggers at .05 cents plus over my entry...that covers more than ALL my expenses....I GO FURTHER,
I ONLY COUNT, AS A PERSONAL WINNER, any trade that hits my PP..(.25) everything else is GRAVY....hence the 5 winners in the example.
I only count any trade that is .30 cents plus and deduct any trade that is below .30...(slippage)"
How can you have "very few at a total loss....about 98% winners" if "many [go] below [your] PP"? You're playing with only 25c range.
Also, what's the distinction b/w a "personal winner" and a [blank] winner???
Nice returns. WTG!
FIREHAWK
Your approach to chat room trading is reasonable. And your returns over the past few years are outstanding (you have reduced chat room trading to a science

I do have one question though....you say:
"M/T makes, oh, lets say about 50 round trips per day .... many above my PP and many below my PP,
but very few at a total loss...about 98% winners is my guess...a winner for me is any trade that triggers at .05 cents plus over my entry...that covers more than ALL my expenses....I GO FURTHER,
I ONLY COUNT, AS A PERSONAL WINNER, any trade that hits my PP..(.25) everything else is GRAVY....hence the 5 winners in the example.
I only count any trade that is .30 cents plus and deduct any trade that is below .30...(slippage)"
How can you have "very few at a total loss....about 98% winners" if "many [go] below [your] PP"? You're playing with only 25c range.
Also, what's the distinction b/w a "personal winner" and a [blank] winner???
Nice returns. WTG!
FIREHAWK
