WSJ: Trump wants to buy Greenland

bone said:
Not unless the corporatist thugs at the DNC change their minds about Tulsi Gabbard.
More...
Is that saying that you think she's the person who could win, or that if she's nominated they'll surely lose? I think her polling is pretty far back at the moment. I actually think Tammy Duckworth is the Democrat who would have the best chance of winning, but unfortunately she's not running. Would also like to see the RNC allow for someone else to compete in the Republican primaries who would be more electable in the general, but that's never gonna happen.
 
Sig said:
Apropos of absolutely nothing? What you're doing here is very interesting from a psychology standpoint. It's easy to feel comfortable with what you believe and with your dislike for those you disagree with if they're clearly morons. Unfortunately if they're actually not, you have to make up moronic beliefs, attribute them to those you disagree with, and then you can safely go back to your bubble happy that you and your tribe-good, those you disagree with-morons.

So, it turns out it's entirely possible for a rational person, in fact it's almost required if you're a rational person, to think that engaging in mid-1800s purchasing of territories by countries in general, and this particular piece of land in particular in 2019 is moronic, while in no way advocating for undoing a purchase that happened 150 years ago. And sorry but I'll come right out and say it, although I don't believe that those who disagree with me in general are morons, if this statement reflects your thought process then it is pretty clear you specifically are a moron.
More...

Wow. That's a lot of reaction.

Sounds like you need a little vacation.

Perhaps the U.S Virgin Islands. which the Americans bought from Denmark in 1917.
 
dozu888 said:
and since the 2 sides are kinda difficult to convince the other who are actually getting brain washed by illusion... the score is easy to settle before 2020.... my trading account is up by 7- digits... how about yours? if you are on the left, you either -

- believe your own BS and traded with bearish bias since Nov 2016 right, as Trump is obviously screwing up everything.... wonder how that has turned out with SP up 40% since the election?

- or you are one of the Dem elites who actually don't believe their own BS and are just telling the rank n file do what I say not what I do?

don't see a 3rd option here.
More...


lol your trading account. Seven digits to the right of the decimal.

2165/2870-1=25%
 
MoneyMatthew said:
Is this a green new deal? :D
More...

You may be more right than you think.

Overnight said:
Now now, be kind to the wunderkinds. Hehe.
That's the only other reason I can see us wanting to nab the land of ice and green...It has considerable fossil fuel supply potential. Twitman would want to drill, baby, drill.
More...

Not fossil fuel... Uranium baby.
Greenland has one of the worlds largest deposits.

https://www.wise-uranium.org/upgl.html
 
Sig said:
Is that saying that you think she's the person who could win, or that if she's nominated they'll surely lose? I think her polling is pretty far back at the moment. I actually think Tammy Duckworth is the Democrat who would have the best chance of winning, but unfortunately she's not running.
More...

Just my own personal opinion - I think that Tulsi Gabbard would stand the best chance of beating Trump. My second choice would be for Andrew Yang.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top