I totally agree with ALL of the above post. However, you have seriously digressed from your initial assertion.... namely that a negative expectancy can be turned into a positive expectancy. You had the fascination of EVERYONE here. No wonder it's such a long thread.Quote from Maverick74:
The risk? Every trade has risk. LOL. Come on man. We can't initiate trades with no risk, that's called arbitrage. We are not talking about arbitrage here.
In your butterfly example, if you bought the strangle, what is your initial risk? Time decay right? You don't need a 1% move, it could be any size move. If you can sell the straddle for a better price then what you lost in decay, then you legged into that fly at better prices.
Whether or not that trade as a whole has a positive expectancy depends on what prices you got. In this example, we don't need the stock to go up, but simply move. If the stock sat there and didn't move, then you would be eating the decay everyday. But I think we both agree that this trade alone, like all trades, has a negative expectancy.
Can you publish your last positive expectancy trade here ?Quote from riskarb:
Nobody would trade if they didn't believe they were trading into a +expectancy.
Quote from Profitaker:
I totally agree with ALL of the above post. However, you have seriously digressed from your initial assertion.... namely that a negative expectancy can be turned into a positive expectancy. You had the fascination of EVERYONE here.
Quote from Maverick74:
Wrong. Has nothing to do with guessing. Has everything to do with adding positive expectancy to the position as a whole. For example, buying back short options trading at a nickel has nothing to do with guessing.