Quote from riskarb:
Bro; I believe he's questioning the validity of the usage of "function"
Quote from Maverick74:
When you are on the floor or talking to a broker, you always pay for debits and sell for credits. If you pay and get a credit you have a risk free position!!!!! Hallelujah!!!!!!!
Do you have more cash on your account after such a transaction? Credit in trading options only refers to a side that receives premium not to actual debit or credit of your account.Interesting - at what deltas do you write 'em? 1 delta?Quote from joecgoodman:
Had I sold otm puts on enron at the worst possible time, I would have lost 5% of my account.
Quote from MAESTRO:
If you short a stock is your account getting debited or credited?![]()
Do you have more cash on your account after such a transaction? Credit in trading options only refers to a side that receives premium not to actual debit or credit of your account.
Quote from smilingsynic:
Quote from kalashnicac:
Yes in theory expectancy should be the same for any kind of strategy, assuming the options are priced correctly.
The expectancy would be zero minus spread minus commissions. For both selling and buying, over the long run, taking into consideration all buyers and sellers.
I am not correcting you--I am just pointing out the obvious to some who think that selling options is a way to tap into a cash cow. The only way one can make money writing options for a living in the long term is to be able (or to be LUCKY enough) to figure out a way to avoid the inevitable yet unforeseen disaster, or simply to cash out the chips while one is still up.
Luck is a much bigger part of the puzzle than one might think, at least in my opinion.
On average writing works most of the time, but when it loses, it can lose big. On average buying does not work most of the time, but when it wins, it can win big. Expenctancy on average for all remains zero minus expenses.
Actually I thought options were priced with an expectancy worth the risk-free rate, not zero...?
I agree with the luck factor but only on a short-term basis. When you see traders that have been around and successfull for YEARS, it can't only be luck...
Quote from kalashnicac:
OK terminology left apart, is my theory about having an edge when playing volatility mean-reversion via any type of fixed loss-fixed payoff (short or long vega) combination valid?