K
krugman25
1-2. The only fair comparison would be one that measures from the start of the bull market rather than an arbitrary point in time like YTD. Like I said, it's a dubious comparison.1. YTD was the easiest to look up, and it is a recent but fairly long time frame. None of the coins picked are new invention. Also, why would we care if a coin went up big a year ago? We are looking for the new new thing.
2. Again, all the coins are listed are a few years old. So stop making invalid points. I mean I get it, you are a cultist but can we have just a little logic here?
3. If you have the time, go ahead. How do you measure risk?
4. Nothing you said makes me believe that. BTC is the only one with heavy institutional holding. As I mentioned in my 2nd post, it is more of a hiddrance than a good thing.
5. Apples to oranges. We are comparing crypto to crypto. Pretty simple.
You are welcome.
3. You're a smart guy, I'm sure you can think of some risk-adjusted return calculations
4. Well, you have a made-up theory and I have 12 years of price and adoption growth data, so you tell me who has the stronger evidence.
When I search ET for bitcoin posts from you I see 50 pages worth of being wrong. What would you call the opinion of someone who's been wrong for over 10 years?
