Quote from jayjay121:
please hurry up tradestation with the portfolio software.

Quote from Wide Tailz:
+1 to that.
Based on your walk forward results I think it's safe to test the system live with a small position size, unless the back test makes postdictive errors or unrealistic fills. Since that part of the strategy has not been disclosed (I may have missed it), I guess you're on your own.
Then again, you never know just whose opinions you're actually getting in here.
![]()
Quote from jayjay121:
was the walk forward optimising a pointless exercise?....because i was thinking i already covered a huge sample and most probably the out of sample data is already in the original system. Is this correct?
Quote from ssrrkk:
I think walk forward only means something if you are optimizing your parameters to a past subset of data and then fixing them for future trades. To me it's almost identical to the out-of-sample testing that you had already done. Of course, a possible wrinkle is that if you believe your parameters will last only for say 5-10 years, then the walk forward might be more relevant and more reflective of your actual live trading than out-of-sample from the distant past.
Quote from jayjay121:
should i do another wfo test with slightly different settings?, like change exit to more, not entry. Say for first 3 years to optimise then use out of sample after that to test on?
this way it would a completley new test and may even show some more robustness as im altering the exit.
I could even slightly change the timeframes, what do you think?
Im just trying to rule out ive coincedently fitted some data or i actually have discovered a real pattern