Would you support a militairy coup in the US?

Would you?

  • 100%

    Votes: 13 31.7%
  • Never ever

    Votes: 24 58.5%
  • Screw the US

    Votes: 4 9.8%

  • Total voters
    41
Quote from CaptainObvious:

There will be no coup, no revolution, just a bunch of people pissing and moaning, myself included. Let's face it, most of us still have too much to lose. Who among us is ready to take the first bullet? Lead the charge up the White house lawn? Risk life in prison? Death? Not me, and not you either.

Sad ... yes.
Our liberties have bought us bondage to comfort.

However when the comfort is gone and there is nothing to lose ...
well ... the outcome is unpredictable.

I see it as a developmental stage. The colonies went through the pissing and moaning stages.
They got uncomfortable ... they got smart and drafted the declaration of Independence.

There was a revolution. The majority of the signers of that declaration went through hell.

We piss and moan and may learn from history or repeat it. Regardless; a squeeze play of necessity is on ...
work through the issues or overcome them ...
Our founding fathers knew these dynamics and set our nation up with that forethought.

Americans have the 2nd amendment ... it has become a "national public insurance policy" against oppressive government,
that says ... "Don't push us too far" and "don't let us become uncomfortable" ...
and "certainly don't piss us off" ... or we will revert to redneck sunsabitches ...

Few understand the sheer brilliance of this by the drafters of the constitution.
It has bought us additional decades of liberty and positioned us for the following ...

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time
with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson
 
I don't support any kind of overthrow because it will inevitably lead to civil war. The suggestion is outrageous and dangerous. Sounds like the ideas of conservatives who didn't get their way.
 
Quote from TraderTactics:

I don't support any kind of overthrow because it will inevitably lead to civil war. The suggestion is outrageous and dangerous. Sounds like the ideas of conservatives who didn't get their way.

My Dad once told me ... I would rather be a communist than dead.

My dad was a very smart guy. And I see why he said that.
However it is selfish and self-serving. Obviously.

I stand for freedom and liberty because it is right to do so.
It is the best for civil men and allows the boundless discovery and growth of mankind.

Patrick Henry "Give me Liberty or give me Death."
http://libertyonline.hypermall.com/henry-liberty.html

Cowardice is an ugly thing in men, it's self righteous, self justifying
rant, desires the appearance of nobility, but is derived from the basest of mans selfishness.
It will readily sacrifice the innocent to save ones own comforts and bare existence.







And, as a Bonus for those lacking the backbone to do right, in selfless service to others:

Rev 21:8 But as for the cowards and the ignoble and the contemptible and the cravenly
lacking in courage and the cowardly submissive,
and as for the unbelieving and faithless, and as for the depraved and defiled with abominations,
and as for murderers and the lewd and adulterous and the
practicers of magic arts and the idolaters (those who give supreme devotion to anyone or
anything other than God) and all liars (those who knowingly convey untruth by word or deed)--
[all of these shall have] their part in the lake that blazes with fire and brimstone.
This is the second death.
 
Quote from unretired:[/i

Cowardice is an ugly thing in men, it's self righteous, self justifying
rant, desires the appearance of nobility, but is derived from the basest of mans selfishness.
It will readily sacrifice the innocent to save ones own comforts and bare existence
---------------------------------------------------------------------


Like this so holy woman that say she only think of the poor Haiti children, but no really.



"She asked for kids at each of the orphanages, and at the end of the day when no one would give her any, she cried," Richard Pickett said. "Why would you cry after you see these kids are being taken care of?"
http://blackchristiannews.com/news/...-orphanages-refused-to-give-her-children.html
 
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c2rd5NlzSP4&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c2rd5NlzSP4&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Who is "Emanuel," Rahm? I wouldn't know anything about any book he may have written. Never read anything by him. Yet I'd be shocked if he advocated a "Military Coup," anywhere, at anytime for any regime.

Could you provide a link that might illustrate your point better?

This is what we were referring to, and it is radical and outrageous. Also Rahm Emanuel was/is an advocate for mandatory civil service.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s
 
Quote from ..........:

The police fits the definition of a civilian security force

So your tellling me the police are just as powerful and well funded as the military?
 
Ok...let me get this straight.

President Obama's civilian security force that is as well funded, as well trained and as well armed as the U.S. Military but does not exist in reality is going to join forces with Rahm Emanuel's mandatory civil service participants who also do not exist are going to conspire to over throw this administration by use of arms and military means?

LOL...you guys kill me.


Quote from PiggyBank:

This is what we were referring to, and it is radical and outrageous. Also Rahm Emanuel was/is an advocate for mandatory civil service.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt2yGzHfy7s
 
Back
Top