Theoretically speaking, considering an ideal daily target of $400, do you think it would be better to attempt 4point with 5 contracts or 10 points with 2 contracts?
The guys above, saying "Your question sounds stupid to me" and "Your question is the TOTAL OPPOSITE of what you should be asking" have it exactly right.
"Plain speaking", maybe ... but exactly right.
I know that this is a dumb question so feel free to insult me if you like
That's very broad-shouldered of you. But they already did (well, maybe) so I'll welcome you to the ET forum, instead. And then try to explain something ...
Here's the thing: the number of contracts you trade ("position-sizing") needs to be determined from other parameters (your trading-plan, the chart, the volatility, the type of entry, your risk-management parameters, how far all those things dictate that your target should be, and so on and so forth), not taken as a starting-point with other parameters subsequently being determined from it. So truly, you have the cart in front of the horse.
I trade NQ every day, and how many points (or ticks) I'm aiming to take from each trade varies, according to the type of entry and the volatility and what the market does, each day. I certainly don't sit down to trade each morning intending to take any fixed amount of money: I sit down intending to follow my trading plan, see what happens, avoid drawdowns and make damn sure I can sit down again the next day and do the same thing.
And personally, I'd advise you against having a "target of $400 per day". The minimum "average target-period" should be a month. I don't think it's necessarily unreasonable to have an "average expectation of $8,400 per month" (that's arithmetically the same, near enough), though I don't do it myself. But it's hard to see much sense in a "daily target": it's a bad way of looking at it, and it may encourage you trade every day whether the chart suits your entry-parameters or not (which can't be wise?) and it may also mean that on a day when you could have taken $1,000 or $1,200, you've stopped after the first $400. I would re-think this completely, if I were you.
I would need (theoretically) to wait for very few high probability set ups while attempting 10 points per days would require more trades, and it would expose me to more potentially losses. Not sure this makes any sense.
It does ... to you (and I can see what you mean by it, too, to be honest). And that's why you have the problem!
Do you have a trading plan with a valid, proven, genuine edge?