Quote from Mag Light:
arguing logic against your cultish emotions is like arguing critical thinking with a two year old. you have shown in each of your childish rants, liberalism/obamanism can't compete in an arena of honest disscussion. 'nuff said.
Which "logic" is that that you speak of?
Your FAILED logic that claimed that the High Court is the de-facto body for determining a President's elibigility for office . . . or how it is that "Photo-Shop" can now produce "raised" State seals???
Is that why you continue to avoid answering my two questions?
Because your logic is so utterly absurd that it is completely unsupported by FACT?
Leave it to you to think that the High Court has ( as one of its functions ) the responsibility to hear cases regarding the determination of a Presidential candidates eligibility . . .
Quote from Mag Light:
moving on, can the obamanites provide a link that shows where and when the high courts heard the eligibility issue and determined he was eligible under the law based on reviewing required documents firsthand as claimed? didn't think so.
Thanks for once again showing us all how much of a total FOOL you are.
Happy Holidays.


hummmmm a little prejudice on YOUR part