Worst Case Scenario in Covered Call trading

When trading a Covered Call (ie. LongStock + ShortCall) then the risk is known in advance as it's
"Risk = InitialStockPrice - InitialCallPremium" that one can lose maximally.
It's also the net invested value, ie. the net debit.
And also the term "covered" indicates this fact.

I just wonder whether this holds always, even if the company goes bankrupt or so?
Are there any situations thinkable where one could lose more than the above pre-computed risk?

The rationale for this question is this:
if there is not any additional hidden risk involved then one can invest more, and the risk would stay relatively the same, on a percentual base. By this, one could concentrate just on this one ticker only instead of looking for multiple tickers for diversification (which takes much time & work, btw).

What's the absolute worst case scenario imaginable for such Covered Call trading?
 
I like to keep this simple. The "worst case scenario" for a Covered Call is the stock going to $0.00. Call premiums do not offset most downward slides in stocks. I have posted this before. I'm not a fan of Buy-Writes in general of single stock names. You take the time and effort to pick a winner, (A symbol you expect will outperform the market and other stocks), but you cap your gains by selling a call that does not really protect your downside. It only offers a small offset toward losses if you are wrong.

What's the absolute worst case scenario imaginable for such Covered Call trading?
 
I like to keep this simple. The "worst case scenario" for a Covered Call is the stock going to $0.00. Call premiums do not offset most downward slides in stocks. I have posted this before. I'm not a fan of Buy-Writes in general of single stock names. You take the time and effort to pick a winner, (A symbol you expect will outperform the market and other stocks), but you cap your gains by selling a call that does not really protect your downside. It only offers a small offset toward losses if you are wrong.
Thanks, but adding some cheap LongPuts to the CC turns the whole into a very interessting construct, IMO.
Ie. by turning the CC into a "Collar" and more.

I just wonder if one can replicate (continue) the trade when an early exercise by the counterparty happens, as this closes the CC early. I think this is the worst-case scenario.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, but adding some cheap LongPuts to the CC turns the whole into a very interessting construct, IMO.
Ie. by turning the CC into a "Collar" and more.

I just wonder if one can replicate (continue) the trade when an early exercise by the counterparty happens, as this closes the CC early. I think this is the worst-case scenario.


CC = synthetic short put
Synthetic short put + put = synthetic bull vertical

There is nothing interesting about it. It's a bull spread. If you're worried about assignment they you're already fcked.
 
CC = synthetic short put
Synthetic short put + put = synthetic bull vertical

There is nothing interesting about it. It's a bull spread. If you're worried about assignment they you're already fcked.

some men, you just can’t reach. So you have what we had here today.
 
adding some cheap LongPuts to the CC turns the whole into a very interessting construct,

A call spread will have the same R:R and lower margins than buying the equity, put & selling the call.

Example:
Buy 100 shares @ 30, buy 25P & sell 35C is the same as buying the 25/35 call spread.
 
An exemplary PnL diagram of an "Extended Collar" (CC + xLP): S=10, SC.K=7.5, LP.K=5, DTE=45
Watch the R:R :D
ExtCollar.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top