You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
World's "most-quoted" Climatologist says carbon-dioxide-based global warming is Bunk
- Thread starter wilburbear
- Start date
Quote from man:
american corporate power is a danger. call them nasty
or whatever. at least two presidents come to my mind
who publicly talked about that.
no one says man is bad, but some men are. or better to
say have their own agenda. man could run this planet
in a different way. and much of the american dreaming
is pure propaganda.
and, yes, you are right, SUVs are helluva in most every
respect.
You did not quote me on the part about all the planets warming. Why is that? This knowledge is from the hallowed left wing leaning halls of publically funded knowledge. It disproves the idea that our planet is warming due to the "evil virus" we lovingly call mankind. It tends to make Gores ideas look like a power grab and a money grab. What's wrong with a little scientific knowledge in this argument?
sorry to hear about your suffering. nevertheless your argumentsQuote from FightTheFuture:
Fact: I am pro environment. Toxic chemicals are killing and sickening animals and humans. The unwise, inefficient land use and destruction of habitat is going on now. That is what is happening now in the real world, not computer models forecasting temperature a thousand years from now. I have what is called Environmental Illness from chemical exposure. It has ruined my life. That is the real world. GW is a pop culture diversion as to what you humans are really doing to the environment. CO2 is not a toxic chemical, it is the major plant nutrient.
Fact: The man-made destruction of nature is not caused and will not be caused by an increase in temperature. With an increase in temperature, there is an increase in biodiversity. We are not going to burn up or whatever the radicals envision. The arctic used to be tropical until the ice age began. We are still within the ice age. This is now another cyclical warm period within the ice age.
lack some depth. "CO2 is not a toxic chemical" is really weak. salt
ain't toxic either, but don't try to eat a pound of it. and about your
last parapgraph, well most of what you call facts here is in disagreement
to majority of the scientific community. melting of ice caps on the
poles can have devastating effects. and even if it was that we
have tropical forests in greenland ... well if that happens at the
expense of five katrinas a year and floods all over the planet ...
quite some cost here.
that popped up relatively recent and i have not seen a statementQuote from maxpi:
You did not quote me on the part about all the planets warming. Why is that? This knowledge is from the hallowed left wing leaning halls of publically funded knowledge. It disproves the idea that our planet is warming due to the "evil virus" we lovingly call mankind. It tends to make Gores ideas look like a power grab and a money grab. What's wrong with a little scientific knowledge in this argument?
of the scientific community as of now. so i have to postpone that
part of the answer. but i disagree that it makes Gore look like
what you think he is. actually i guess al gore would be quite
happy if his scenarios were untrue and we cooled again soon.
you are mixing up things in such an obviously superficial way, thatQuote from Haroki:
Yes, protesting a 40 db wind turbine that will produce clean energy is a perfectly reasonable way to protect our children...
it is hard to answer, since you will come up with another such
plain generalisation. nevertheless, i give it a try: comparing the
efforts of thousands of people around the globe who deeply and
honestly care about what is going on to a very specific situation
where whoever protests for whatever reason against a wind
turbine is ... unreasonable. at best.
Quote from man:
you are mixing up things in such an obviously superficial way, that
it is hard to answer, since you will come up with another such
plain generalisation. nevertheless, i give it a try: comparing the
efforts of thousands of people around the globe who deeply and
honestly care about what is going on to a very specific situation
where whoever protests for whatever reason against a wind
turbine is ... unreasonable. at best.
No, it's just that I found it hilarious that you would defend enviromentalists protesting a wind turbine.
I guess that's to be expected. You should watch the Penn & Teller bullshit video on enviromentalists to give yourself a view on just how misguided a lot of these folks are.
- signing petitions to outlaw dihygrogen monoxide - H2O - water, and all because they're all
'caught up' in the giddyness of being with a bunch of other goofballs.
- burning Hummers because they put out too much pollution. Prolly more pollution put out by the burning than the Hummer ever will.
- burning houses under construction in Colorado and putting the surrounding forest at risk, all in the name of conserving the forest lands.
- one of the heads of PETA using bovine insulin to control her diabetes, even though PETA is against the use of any animal byproducts or animal experimentation. SHe justifies her use because it allows her to carry on the fight for animals..
It goes on and on. You sure that you want to defend ALL enviromentalists? Maybe you should pick your fights a little better if you want to maintain any respect......
i don't defend ALL environmentalists but "environmentalism"Quote from Haroki:
No, it's just that I found it hilarious that you would defend enviromentalists protesting a wind turbine.
...
You sure that you want to defend ALL enviromentalists? Maybe you should pick your fights a little better if you want to maintain any respect......
as such. and well, i do not think i gained any respect so
there is none to maintain.