I don't know. My impression is it is mostly political representation that is there. I like to hear from all sides on an issue before making up my mind. The press coverage seems to suggest that the conference is predicated on the need for reducing CO2 emissions. I am certainly not opposed to that because I believe there will be some worthwhile benefits. But I think it is a mistake not to get the science right before you act. I think the science is telling us that cutting CO2 emissions will have practically no effect on climate, but there will be worthwhile reductions in air pollution that will be incidental. I am very much in favor of getting the science right first.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
World Leaders Producing 300,000 Tons of Carbon By Traveling To Climate Summit In Paris
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
I don't know. My impression is it is mostly political representation that is there. I like to hear from all sides on an issue before making up my mind. The press coverage seems to suggest that the conference is predicated on the need for reducing CO2 emissions. I am certainly not opposed to that because I believe there will be some worthwhile benefits. But I think it is a mistake not to get the science right before you act. I think the science is telling us that cutting CO2 emissions will have practically no effect on climate, but there will be worthwhile reductions in air pollution that will be incidental. I am very much in favor of getting the science right first.
Liar
Liar
Oh... it's our own little Climate Jihadi, futurecurrents, who regularly advocates torturing and jailing all the "deniers".
Yet all he can do is call people names and re-post debunked nonsense repeatedly hundreds of times.
It must be frustrating for futurecurrents that he is unable to live out his daily fantasy of permanently silencing those who doubt AGW.
I believe Piezoe has a unifier instinct, so sometimes I think he's just taken his position so he can maintain some traction with the righties here.
Why should he care about that? Have you ever known him to be anything other than progressive, intelligent, knowledgable and generally correct? I myself have given him likes. Seems strange that in this one area he turns into Mr Hyde, repeating all the classic denier lies wrapped in a pseudo scientific veneer and impressive and copious superflous verbage. particularly since he presents himself as some kind of scientist.
If the Koch bros and their conservative thinks have people on social media trying to spread doubts about man made global warming, those people would look and sound just like piezoe.
Oh, and there is no doubt that they do. Just sayin.
And nitro, feel free to offer your opinion also.