WORLD EXCLUSIVE : The point of no return is just days away

Some people must know When to build Wells, Dams and Distillation Plants, before it's too late!

1194px-EC_Drawing_Well.JPG


Glen_canyon_dam.jpg


683px-Colonne_distillazione.jpg



While some others merely rely on falling rains! That's OK too!

rainjpeg.jpg
 
Last edited:
Really, a change to energy outflow can't change the temperature? If I throw on a blanket, I feel warmer because my metabolism and heat output rises?


Oh come on Ric! Look at the impressive words he used! Isn't that enough to counter the opinion of all the world's experts on the matter?
 
Oh come on Ric! Look at the impressive words he used! Isn't that enough to counter the opinion of all the world's experts on the matter?
Hehe, well we're not doing anything about the matter here anyway. Like I say, the world is moving on as if AGW is fact. We're away from the table, out of the boardroom and outta the loop.

By the way, re the argument we constantly hear, that you shouldn't be in your line of work because it releases even more GHG, hasn't your technology evolved over time? I'd be surprised to hear your industry hasn't done a thing.
 
his industry replaced CO2 with a greenhouse gas 2000 times more powerful partially in response to global nutter scares and irrational govt regulation.



Hehe, well we're not doing anything about the matter here anyway. Like I say, the world is moving on as if AGW is fact. We're away from the table, out of the boardroom and outta the loop.

By the way, re the argument we constantly hear, that you shouldn't be in your line of work because it releases even more GHG, hasn't your technology evolved over time? I'd be surprised to hear your industry hasn't done a thing.
 
do you and fraudcurrents not understand anything about our climate system, negative feedbacks and scientific fact that co2 is also a coolant?

Really, a change to energy outflow can't change the temperature? If I throw on a blanket, I feel warmer because my metabolism and heat output rises?
 
scientific fact that co2 is also a coolant?
We don't live at 60,000 (or whatever) feet. And even if that CO2 could somehow cool us "down here", it's not completely reversing the "underwater volcano" caused warming, even as we've added to its supply.
 
Acidifying oceans highlight Australia’s barren climate policy

Peter Boyer 10 May 2016


The fourth international conference on The ocean in a high-CO2 world looked at how high carbon dioxide levels are affecting oceans and their inhabitants. It revealed some grim findings.

Carbon dioxide’s warming effect has been known for 150 years, but we knew virtually nothing about a second outcome of human emissions – rising acidity of ocean waters – until the early years of this century.

The extent and impact of ocean acidification is revealed in the scope of the Hobart conference — 218 presentations and 109 posters looking at the myriad ways seawater acidity is happening, affecting all marine life down to microscopic organisms, around all continents and in the deep ocean.

The most telling statistic about today’s ocean acidification is the rate at which it’s unfolding. Acidity has increased by 30 per cent in less than 100 years. That’s at least ten times and more likely well over 20 times the rate of acidification in the last big event previously, 56 million years ago.

The Hobart meeting heard that today’s change may be the most rapid in 300 million years. Time, and plenty of it, is all-important if living things are to adapt. Quickly-changing ocean chemistry is exacerbating coral bleaching, depressing immune responses and making it harder for some organisms to form shells and other structures needing calcium.

The impact is especially severe when warming ocean water and marine pollution are added, affecting coastal shellfish farming and causing the Great Barrier Reef’s worst bleaching on record.

One of the world’s best-known climate scientists, Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution, California – a co-author of the paper that first described ocean acidification in 2003 – told the Hobart meeting of the enormous challenge posed to science by a high-CO2 ocean.

More: https://independentaustralia.net/en...ghlight-australias-barren-climate-policy,8971
 
Dystopian Reality – a Climate Change Future

April 25, 2016

Beyond 2050

The world after 2050 may appear, to our 2016 eyes, as a dystopia, but this is no fantasy. There are no happy endings in store. The seeds which are planted over the next thirty years – both good and bad – will direct the fate of humanity as the state of the planet Earth continues to deteriorate.

By the 2050s, the Amazon rainforest is in irreversible decline. Deforestation by humans, combined with wildfires exacerbated by climate change http://www.businessinsider.com.au/amazon-rain-forest-fires-are-burning-2015-1 , have had an irreversible effect. The eventual death of the rainforest is now a certainty http://www.treehugger.com/natural-sciences/half-the-amazon-could-be-lost-by-2050-says-study.html , and as the forest itself plays a major role in regulating the planet’s climate, its loss is one further accelerant to climate change.

Long article: http://theaimn.com/dystopian-reality-climate-change-future/

image.gif
 
Last edited:
Really, a change to energy outflow can't change the temperature? If I throw on a blanket, I feel warmer because my metabolism and heat output rises?
I'm not the best one to try and answer these questions. We need an expert on heat transfer. But I would guess that via your metabolism you are constantly combusting the fuel in your body to supply heat and your blanket, being a poor thermal conductor is decreasing the rate of heat exchange with your body's surroundings.

Miskolczi's paper has of course attracted a lot of attention. There was a long discussion thread on Roy Spencers blog in 2010. http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/08/comments-on-miskolczi’s-2010-controversial-greenhouse-theory/ the Aug 6, 2010 , post from Stephen Wilde somewhat expresses my own views. If you do a google on Ferenc Miskolczi you will turn up quite a bit of comment and discussion.

This was interesting: http://www.examiner.com/article/for...fends-theory-refuting-global-warming-doctrine

This details the efforts to keep his work out of the public eye, even though his papers are in recognized, peer reviewed journals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ferenc_Miskolczi

Here is a link to his 2014 paper published in "Earth Science". http://edberry.com/SiteDocs/PDF/Miskolczi_2015.pdf

Hansen's boys don't like it when one of their own disagrees: (my comment)

NASA silenced Ferenc Miskolczi on his GHG research


by Dr Miklos Zagoni, Physicist, Budapest, Hungary, 31 Dec, 2009

In 2004, Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi published a paper “The greenhouse effect and the spectral decomposition of the clear-sky terrestrial radiation“, in the Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service (Vol. 108, No. 4, October–December 2004, pp. 209–251.).

The co-author of the article was his boss at NASA (Martin Mlynczak). Mlynczak put his name to the paper but did no work on it. He thought that it was an important paper, but only in a technical way.

When Miskolczi later informed the group at NASA there that he had more important results, they finally understood the whole story, and tried to withhold Miskolczi’s further material from publication. His boss for example, sat at Ferenc’s computer, logged in with Ferenc’s password, and canceled a recently submitted paper from a high-reputation journal as if Ferenc had withdrawn it himself. That was the reason that Ferenc finally resigned from his ($US 90.000 /year) job.

I want to make it clear: NASA never falsified or even tried to falsify Ferenc’s results, on the contrary, they fully understand it. They know that it is correct and see how important it is. To make sense of their actions, they probably see a national security issue in it. Perhaps they think that AGW is the only way to stop, or to slow, the coal-based growth of China.

In my circumstance where I have been dismissed from my Government paid position in Hungary, I think the information vacuum (in Hungary), has the same type of origin. I believe someone is in the background trying to convince the establishment (media, science, politics) that Miskolczi’s results are against our national security interests.

First, they tried to frighten me, and then when that did not work, they kicked me out from my job. So now I am turning to the wider internet to publicize Miskolczi’s work, as I know that his results are valid and true. There is no way and no need to hold them back for the world to understand them.

Tomorrow, for the first time in my life, I am jobless.
 
Last edited:
is it hard to understand that blocking warming at 60000 feet could keep you cooler down here.

the underwater vents and volcanoes do seem to be heating the ocean... and melting polar ice.
but that is our sides points... not yours. We don't know that we are warming outside natural variation.

We don't live at 60,000 (or whatever) feet. And even if that CO2 could somehow cool us "down here", it's not completely reversing the "underwater volcano" caused warming, even as we've added to its supply.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top