Woman Born in Nazi Germany: Trump Isn’t Like Hitler, Rioting Leftists Are

Not only do I know my English. I also face basic realities. "Open Society" is about imposing Soros' vision on the world.

The current definition of "liberal" is socialist - rather than neo-classical liberal. Stalin is a good example of a socialist who supported authoritarianism and drove his vision of "open society".
I think there might be room for you on jem's boat.
 
You are most likely to board his boat first.

the protests are being funded by those who desire authoritarian rule. Soros does not like our freedoms in America.
Not only do I know my English. I also face basic realities. "Open Society" is about imposing Soros' vision on the world.

The current definition of "liberal" is socialist - rather than neo-classical liberal. Stalin is a good example of a socialist who supported authoritarianism and drove his vision of "open society".

Think again. You and jem are two peas in a sinking pod.
 
Lacesout said it perfectly, you can say your against authoritarianism all you want, but if you look around the school yard after you just beat the shit out of everyone you dont like, and no one is left standing other than you, then you are the bully.

This is a concept that seems to be lost on the left, half the country voted for Trump, and now lefties are`viciously attacking people at riots, supposedly in the name of taking out bullies, now there is no Trump supporter in their right mind who would walk into a left wing protest, so whose getting bullied here?

I dont deny Trump is a bully, but he hasnt caused physical harm to anyone, only left wing protestors have done that so far, which side is acting like jackboot thugs?

Come on, you know better. People against authoritarianism will not tolerate a move in that direction. Are you suggesting that someone against authoritarianism should welcome it? Did you really think it through?

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
 
Last edited:
Come on, you know better. People against authoritarianism will not tolerate a move in that direction. Are you suggesting that someone against authoritarianism should welcome it? Did you really think it through?

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke


People against a move towards a commie, amoral society will not tolerate a move in that direction. So any violence unleashed against them is justified.

Thank you for so adroitly providing the moral justification for us.
 
What authoritarianism? They trashed U.C. berkley because a gay jew wanted to speak, and supposedly they are protesting Fascism, lol.

Any bipartisan person looking at this from the outside would automatically assume the people destroying property, and assaulting people because they didnt want a gay jew to speak were the nazis, its pretty clear cut.

This.
 
Not only do I know my English. I also face basic realities. "Open Society" is about imposing Soros' vision on the world.

The current definition of "liberal" is socialist - rather than neo-classical liberal. Stalin is a good example of a socialist who supported authoritarianism and drove his vision of "open society".

Exactly. I cannot understand how "liberal" means "protest with violence any view outside our own".
 
CfCr-TgWsAAFjJ3.jpg
 
Back
Top