Same Old Same Old. Noone even hears you anymore.
Wolff’s Admission to Lies in His Book Puts Him in Legal Jeopardy
- Thread starter Max E.
- Start date
Of course you don't, the weak minded Trump supporter is easily manipulated, his sole purpose in life is to be taken advantage of my con men like Trump.
Now go back to ball washing a man who adheres to 'conservative principle' of fucking their friends wives and making crude remarks about 10 year olds and his own daughter. That's conservative morals for you.
Investigative reporting is more than just repeating what someone said; it is about finding an underlying thread to the truth.
Whether Wolff embellished or not remains to be seen; the book just came out. But he has in no way indicted himself by stating that he didn't accept everything said to him at face value. If anything, his seeking confirmation bought him some credibility. This isn't Fox, you know.
I'd have to say I'm interested in public policies that generally affect local/national/global lives. To me, policies and strategies or dynamics/ systems are almost interchangeable terms.
I think that doesn't exactly mean politics but it appears to me that politics and public policies are easily intervened. Leaving many lives living in fairly uncomfortable environment and conditions. Sad!
Historically, it has been proved that some politicians are just good at creating unneeded conflicts through effective politics (sometimes even religions). That, imo, is simply a huge waste of resources which should be used for needy people and places, locally and internationally. Then a better peaceful and mindful world, I think!
Vision statement, imo, should be a good thing for modern corporations. Should vision statements be applicable to nations (that could be useful for voters to decide their meaningful votes according to their National Vision, rather than ...)?
Perhaps National Vision statement could really unite people, much more than any slogans - ad hoc!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_statement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_statement
We of course cannot say that a nation without producing a Vision statement has no National Vision, can we? lol
I think that doesn't exactly mean politics but it appears to me that politics and public policies are easily intervened. Leaving many lives living in fairly uncomfortable environment and conditions. Sad!
Historically, it has been proved that some politicians are just good at creating unneeded conflicts through effective politics (sometimes even religions). That, imo, is simply a huge waste of resources which should be used for needy people and places, locally and internationally. Then a better peaceful and mindful world, I think!
Vision statement, imo, should be a good thing for modern corporations. Should vision statements be applicable to nations (that could be useful for voters to decide their meaningful votes according to their National Vision, rather than ...)?
Perhaps National Vision statement could really unite people, much more than any slogans - ad hoc!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_statement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_statement
We of course cannot say that a nation without producing a Vision statement has no National Vision, can we? lol
Last edited:
Yeah, really:
Right, and that makes my point. Trump wrote a book promoting himself and book sales.
The Wolff clown is worse though because he is trying to promote his book sales by pretending to be an investigative journalist exposing the truth. If Wolff wrote a book about himself as Trump did then that would be different. But he didn't. He is hammering someone else and trying to bring someone else down so his bullshit matters more than Trump bragging about himself.
"Investigative journalist" my arse. You will be seeing him at Barnes and Nobles, not testifying before a committee somewhere.
And then we have Comey's book coming out at some point. And we will have to put up with that clown pretending to be serving the people out there on the front lines signing books at Barnes and Noble.
Last edited:
And you know this how? You're just talking out of your...right wing.
As I noted earlier, it remains to be seen how accurate Wolff's book is. You're already dismissing it without evidence to support your claim. Sounds rather familiar...and orange.
How do you not know this? sheesh.
Some clown going from program to program on TV hawking his book. What the frig do you think he is doing?
Are we still talking about Trump and his book? Sounds like it.
Last edited:
I recall watching MSNBC this past Thursday morning because I wanted to see Stephanie Rule interview the Mooch. In the segment just previous to that interview I heard her say that even if 80% of what was written in the book was false it was till damning evidence against Trump. You really need to stop and think about that for a moment. The left is ready to accept that 4 out of 5 negative statements about Trump are false, pure fabrication. Anything that pushes the narrative will be used regardless of facts. The bar for what is considered a credible source is about as low as we have ever seen.