Without a Reagan Revolution turnout on Nov 8, we're done.

[achilles28]

Look at the margins Democrats won the general with, the last 25 years. >100 electoral votes. GW eeked it out once, and won another by "a landslide" of 34 Ev's. Joe Scarborough always drives that point home. It's so hard for Republicans to win the White House now because the Democrats start with such a huge lead. If you play with the electoral map, Democrats just have to win a few more states out ~20 or so, that are up for grabs.

We could be done for. If the country is too far left now, the ship might just go over. Reagan basically ran the board. He won nearly every single state. Trump has to do the same. It doesn't look good to me.. Realistically, what are our chances?

 

[achilles28]

As Gnome likes to say, the tit-suckers have taken over. Too many of em now.

 

[Ricter]

You could have normal turnout and overconfident dems stay home and freeride on their "certain" victory. Or Sanders supporters, angered that they're not getting European socialism NOW, say "fuck it give it to Trump the country be damned" and stay home.

 

[Scataphagos]

As Gnome likes to say, the tit-suckers have taken over. Too many of em now.

It's not even a matter of "tit-suckers taking over". It's more that politicos HANDED TIT-SUCKERS THE COUNTRY... for Leftist political power and control objectives. Not surprising. Odumbo telegraphed it even before his inauguration. This BS of forced Hispanic and muslim immigration... all part of the design to DESTROY AMERICA!!

Obama... the Benedict Arnold of our time!

Makes me sick.

If I could turn back the clock... and have some omniscient tell me "this is how it's going to turn out".. and asked if I still wanted to serve my country in the US military, I would have said FUCK NO!! I'm not putting my life and career plans on hold for THAT!

 

[Covertibility]

Clinton 347 Trump 191

2016 probably ends up looking like that.

 

[Ricter]

Clinton 347 Trump 191

2016 probably ends up looking like that.

Pity I'm voting in Alaska. Useless vote I think.

 

[piezoe]

We could be done for.

Your chances would be worse if our presidents were elected democratically. You should be damn glad for the electoral "college". (And for the Supreme Court!!!)
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralcoll.htm

(from the New Republic)

 

[Tom B]

Your chances would be worse if our presidents were elected democratically. You should be damn glad for the electoral "college". (And for the Supreme Court!!!)
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/electoralcoll.htm

(from the New Republic)

Once again, you demonstrate that you are a reality denier.

 

[piezoe]

Clinton 347 Trump 191

2016 probably ends up looking like that.

This seems a bit optimistic to me if you're a Trump supporter. Hillary is the more skillful liar. Trump's lies are too obvious. Trump has to depend not only on gullibility, as does Hillary of course, but also on the minority of voters with an "I don't care if the kids are in it, I'm going to burn the house down anyway to get even with the mortgage company" attitude.

 

[piezoe]

Pity I'm voting in Alaska. Useless vote I think.

You can influence down ballot issues maybe. Where I live, that would be my only reason for voting, if I decide to vote. I am not one of those naive believer in the virtues of democracy, but I do chuckle when I hear Washington politicians refer to the U.S. as a "democracy."