With Windows Defender out, how low can the anti-virus sector go?

Quote from Hydroblunt:

You guys need to do some CNET searching, Windows Defender is pure crap.

So are the Norton & Mcafee products, they are near worthless.

I think before starting any debates on this and talking up Google superiority, try out the many products out there. I use ZoneAlarm and AVG, which are by far the best products I have seen. Especially ZoneAlarm.
Speaking of which, I been using them for free but I am so impressed with the products, I am going to buy the Pro versions.

Of course, if the IT execs at the companies actually cared or knew about the issue, they would be running Linux/Unix. Funny how open ended source codes have easy ways to immunize the computers and networks from security breaches and spyware.
More...


Bah, I have done cnet research already and I love how they have everything connected in the interactive function to the right of the article usually.

I would never rely on cnet for technical information though, maybe quick tech news but nothing more.

However, zonealarm is a good free program but avg even as free sucks. If you truly want to ensure you have a good virus program, just spend $20 dollars a year and get BitDefender, it is in the top three in protection for viruses.

I think most smart IT, have already made the switch to unix/linux or are in the process.

Plus, with defender spyware out, and microsoft trying to block the kernal from virus programs, is just a prelude to how microsoft is attempting to launch their own free microsoft virus program to be integrated in defender for the future.

As for AVG, I suggets you go with bitdefender.

Peace
 
Windows defender is not good, won't even update the definitions correctly on XP pro even after the regisrty edits.
They need to fix it first, before any other stocks have to worry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top