With Three Simple Answers, Mueller Can Speak Volumes

Those were Mueller's own words on national television.

It'll be interesting to hear him speak tomorrow. Perhaps you will find it clarifying.
I know those were his own words and the left is, for the time being, allowing that bullshit to prevail. We'll see if anyone on the left cares about Trumps ability to run the country if he wins again.
 
I know those were his own words and the left is, for the time being, allowing that bullshit to prevail.
The left? It was Trump's DOJ's guidelines within which Mueller was operating. Mueller, the Republican, operating under the guidelines of a Republican-run DOJ. You need a new compass.

As for allowing the bullshit to prevail, I'm so glad you brought that up:

Trey Gowdy: Mueller Testimony Must Follow DOJ Policy Not To Discuss Derogatory Information On Unindicted Person

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...ogatory_information_on_unindicted_person.html


Hear it from the reptiles themselves on Fox, their home turf:


Talk about having your cake and eating it, too. First, the special counsel could not indict a sitting president. And now, Gowdy does not want derogatory information discussed on "unindicted person." Yeah, Mueller agreed to it. But you're blaming the left?! Seriously?

And now you're saying Trump is innocent because was not indicted? Are you actually following these breadcrumbs? And, if so, are you dizzy yet from going in circles?
 
Last edited:
The left? It was Trump's DOJ's guidelines within which Mueller was operating. Mueller, the Republican, operating under the guidelines of a Republican-run DOJ. You need a new compass.

Ahh, no in regard to the guideline thing.

Mueller repeatedly stated that he was bound by department guidelines and the opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in regard to prosecuting a president. Established long before Trump came along.
 
It's Mueller time....again:

theshiningHS-1024x576.jpg
 
The whole thing is political kabuki theater, the libs will all take their turn asking Mueller carefully framed accusations in the form of questions, none of which Mueller will be able to answer but the inability to answer will be seen as proof by the left.

Likewise the pub’s will grill Mueller on his knowledge of when he knew this or that, none of which Mueller will answer but the inability to answer will be seen as proof and culpability by the right.

Both sides will use the debacle to stoke the flames and feed their constituents.

Imho, the dems will gain a notch or two if only for a short time by refocusing the narrative off their political suicide squad and on to anything else.
 
The whole thing is political kabuki theater, the libs will all take their turn asking Mueller carefully framed accusations in the form of questions, none of which Mueller will be able to answer but the inability to answer will be seen as proof by the left.

Likewise the pub’s will grill Mueller on his knowledge of when he knew this or that, none of which Mueller will answer but the inability to answer will be seen as proof and culpability by the right.

Both sides will use the debacle to stoke the flames and feed their constituents.

Imho, the dems will gain a notch or two if only for a short time by refocusing the narrative off their political suicide squad and on to anything else.
The grandstanding sure to be worthy of an academy award. They will be shocked, shocked I tell you. The media whores will be out in force.
 
There are just three simple yes-or-no questions Congress should ask Robert Mueller:

Mr. Mueller, the president said your report found, in his words, “no collusion, no obstruction, complete and total exoneration.”

First, did your report find there was no collusion?

Second, did your report find there was no obstruction?

Third, did your report give the president complete and total exoneration?

That’s it. That’s the ballgame.
AH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH HOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO EH HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
 
Back
Top