Wiretapping: New Event Introduced

Or maybe this:

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/...wire-tapped-his-phones-cites-no-evidence.html

...Neither Trump nor his aides offered any citation to back up his accusation about Obama. The president may have been prompted by a story on the conservative website Breitbart and commentary from talk radio host Mark Levin suggesting that the Obama administration used “police state” tactics to monitor the Trump team...

Yes, of course. Suddenly the nytimes and the washcompost site lack of evidence as a defining characteristic that without which, there is nothing but a conspiracy theory.

After pushing the russian hack and trump involvement for over three months now. Without a shred of evidence.

A Mark Levin podcast is as much evidence as a CIA report that 'disclaims any warranty as to the facts presented herein'. LOL

Your hypocrisy trading account must be up double digits and it's only March!
 
Never said Obama did it, looks like it was from investigations from DOJ. More importantly looking to determine what effect it would have on the markets. Not concerned about the political aspects of it. There is whole analysis of the political aspects of was it done or not in various blogs on the net.
And this will cause the market to selloff?
Obongo wiretapped a political opponent and then he thought he could get away with it by inventing the Russian spy frenzy to justify his Nixonian, Watergate style tactics.

We're about to delve into the real scandal, as opposed to the phony one that's been pushed about talking to Russians.
so true, but who is this "we" kemosabe? We as in just a small group who objectively follow the facts. If you're waiting to see it on tv I hope you are very young. I'll be dead when they finally expose it in the documentary.
 
Here is an article for the reality deniers. This article includes the actual tweets from Odumbo officials.

Non-Denial ‘Denial’: Obama Response to Trump ‘Wiretap’ Claim Raises More Questions
upload_2017-3-5_6-59-21.jpeg


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...esponse-trump-wiretap-claim-raises-questions/
 
The media speculated for months about the results of surveillance that looked into contacts between trump's organization and Russians. They ripped Gen. Flynn apart over dubious allegations of colluding with russians, all supposedly based on leaks from intell sources.

Now they speak with one voice denouncing Trump for accusing Obama of tapping him and his campaign? Obamas' spox denial was a study in clintonian doublespeak. Ex head of national security Clapper is a know liar, so his denials count for nothing. We know that ex CIA Director Brennan is a fanatical trump hater and muslin defender.

There is far more meat on this bone than the non-existent Russian collusion fairy tale, yet the media are obsessed with the latter and apparently in lock step to discredit the former. A simple google search will see that, once again, they are all using the same key phrases, no doubt provided to them by some soros or creepy podesta group. Suddenly "no evidence" is supposed to end the discussion, rather than lead to calls for congressional investigations and special prosecutors. It seems surprising, to say the least, that the media suddenly ignore all the previous evidence of surveillance of the trump campaign the minute they see it could lead to blowback for Obama. It's almost like they are biased or something. LOL
 
Back
Top