Quote from rwk:
Thanks for the feedback. My development machine just turned 8, and that's ancient in computer years. I would like to replace it, and I want something that will last like the current one did. I skipped Vista because of all the bad things I heard, and I am seriously considering skipping Win7 too. I agree with Dvorak that the registry is a POS (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2351198,00.asp). I am thinking of going with WinXP 64-bit. Comments?
This is an excellent point, and one I had not considered. A 64-bit OS will address more memory than 4GB, but 32-bit apps will not. The 32-bit address space is only 4GB. Maybe there are some fancy tricks (e.g. far pointers) I don't know about that allow a bigger address space. So it sounds like having more than 4GB memory only allows us to load up more programs. That's a pretty minor benefit. It sounds like I'll be staying with a 32-bit OS (probably WinXP) for now.Quote from maxpi:
"use more ram" means you can install more on the motherboard. If your software won't use it, it won't make any difference..
Quote from rwk:
This is an excellent point, and one I had not considered. A 64-bit OS will address more memory than 4GB, but 32-bit apps will not. The 32-bit address space is only 4GB. Maybe there are some fancy tricks (e.g. far pointers) I don't know about that allow a bigger address space. So it sounds like having more than 4GB memory only allows us to load up more programs. That's a pretty minor benefit. It sounds like I'll be staying with a 32-bit OS (probably WinXP) for now.
Quote from maxpi:
One advantage to going 64bit is that you can address a huge amount of ram beyond the 32bit limitation of 4gb..
And the lockup problem, I listen to Leo Laporte often, I've heard more than just a few callers that had problems when their Windows machine comes out of sleep mode or whatever the power save options are.. I've heard of lost files, permanent lockups, etc.. that's what makes me despise Microsoft, the ongoing things that never get attended to..