Will Elite Trader please take a stand against dangerous anti-vaxxer bullshit?

[Frederick Foresight]

Whatever happened to the good ol' solution of simply not participating in threads that annoy you while continuing to participate in threads that don't annoy you? Or are you saying that all of them are annoying you?

The principles I was referring to are fiber-related.

As for the rest of it, it's the tangential association with a whole truckload of fucking idiots and bigots that irks me sometimes. I guess it's a quality control thing. I wish you had more of it. Way too many isms running free. Yeah, I could ignore it, but I'm still in the general vicinity whether my eyes are closed or not.

For example, say you like a club. Good atmosphere, good company and so on. But the basement has regular KKK meetings. That offends you. So the proprietor tells you to just not attend their meetings. Ignore them. Still feel the same way about the club?

 

[themickey]

There are certain people on ET, many on my ignore or block list, who frequent ET regularly.
They constantly talk nonsense, with me they carry a reputation.
There are odd times, sometimes when bored, sometimes if a fight breaks out, I will view their opinion offline and its always the same, those sames guys talking nonsense.
So for me, I refuse to interact with them, they can talk nonsense because I know it's nonsense.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I still think ET is doing a disservice by allowing the peddling of false and potentially dangerous information during a pandemic. It is just wrong any way you look at it.

 

[ipatent]

I still think ET is doing a disservice by allowing the peddling of false and potentially dangerous information during a pandemic. It is just wrong any way you look at it.

GWB keeps them on a short leash. You're a male Karen.

 

[Magna]

I still think ET is doing a disservice by allowing the peddling of false and potentially dangerous information during a pandemic. It is just wrong any way you look at it.

I realize it's obvious to you, but please explain how to know in advance that information is false and dangerous. For instance, as Joe Rogan discussed in his so-called apology video, were these ideas false?

1. after you get vaccinated you can still catch Covid and you can still spread Covid
2. cloth masks are not effective in preventing Covid
3. Covid came from a lab

All three turned out to be true and are accepted now as fact by the government and the media, but if you espoused them just a few months ago you would have been banned from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube for spreading dangerous misinformation.

You started this thread and if you are going to continue to press the issue with your statement above then you need to clarify what standard should be used to censor ideas you disagree with, ideas you don't like. And please be specific.

 

[smallfil]

I realize it's obvious to you, but please explain how to know in advance that information is false and dangerous. For instance, as Joe Rogan discussed in his so-called apology video, were these ideas false?

1. after you get vaccinated you can still catch Covid and you can still spread Covid
2. cloth masks are not effective in preventing Covid
3. Covid came from a lab

All three turned out to be true and are accepted now as fact by the government and the media, but if you espoused them just a few months ago you would have been banned from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube for spreading dangerous misinformation.

You started this thread and if you are going to continue to press the issue with your statement above then you need to clarify what standard should be used to censor ideas you disagree with, ideas you don't like. And please be specific.

He is just a fascist plain and simple. All he wants to do is shut up anyone else with a contrary opinion. All ET trolls continue to claim the extreme liberal positions that Ivermectin cannot cure Corona Virus although, there are numerous peer reviewed studies by real, board certified doctors who are experts in their field. None of the ET trolls including, GWB are doctors are they? So, to say something is fake news is mere conjecture. Ivermectin, use of masks, shutdowns have been debated on the ET message boards and overwhelming evidence provided that ET trolls are wrong on their bogus assertions. They just cannot accept the fact that they are wrong with their fat egos, and being called out on it.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

1. after you get vaccinated you can still catch Covid and you can still spread Covid
2. cloth masks are not effective in preventing Covid
3. Covid came from a lab

You can still catch COVID after you’re fully vaccinated, but the odds are lower, and the effect will be less extreme in the aggregate. And we’re looking in the aggregate rather than anecdotes. So, please, stop with the implied false equivalence.

Cloth masks are not as useful with the omicron variant, but I still wear them in the normal course. When I expect to be in closer proximity to unknown others, I add a medical mask. Is there a point here I’m missing?

I did not think it was yet definitive that the virus originated in a lab. If I am not mistaken, the subject is still being debated. But who gives a shit? How does that change how we emerge from this pandemic?

What annoys me is that you guys let morons continually spew shit here about malaria and stomach worm drugs, and the “dangers” of the vaccines. In your own little way, you’re helping to prolong the pandemic. Congratulations.

[Edited by Magna:] There is something fundamentally wrong with the structure of FF's quote of my post, so best I explain it here for easy reference to all. When you quote someone who is referencing an article, podcast, video, etc. be sure to clarify the ATTRIBUTION so it is unmistakable where the quoted words are coming from. In other words, don't muck it up like FF did here by implying that I said those 3 things when in my post I made it clear they were examples Joe Rogan gave in his video.

 

[Overnight]

You can still catch COVID after you’re fully vaccinated, but the odds are lower, and the effect will be less extreme in the aggregate...

FALSE! You can catch COVID whether you are vaccinated or not. The virus does not get near your body and then detect the vaccine and go, "Gee, that will hurt me, let's fly away from here."

Cloth masks are not as useful with the omicron variant,

FALSE!

Cloth masks are not useful with any variant, and with any virus, especially when the user does not wear the mask properly. Such as not covering the nose with the mask, or touching the front of their mask to adjust it and then itching their eyeball. That is common sense. In that case, no masks work. Not even a N95™ mask from 3M.

What annoys me is that you guys let morons continually spew shit.

It is really quite simple.

A. Wear a mask when out in public.

B. Use hand sanitizer when you get back into your vehicle (if applicable.)

C. Wash your hands with warm soapy water when you get home.

Ca. Don't touch your eyeballs in public!

I have been typing that shit regularly for two years. If people would listen to that, we'd be done with this shit already.

 

[Magna]

You can still catch COVID after you’re fully vaccinated, but the odds are lower, and the effect will be less extreme in the aggregate. And we’re looking in the aggregate rather than anecdotes. So, please, stop with the implied false equivalence.

Cloth masks are not as useful with the omicron variant, but I still wear them in the normal course. When I expect to be in closer proximity to unknown others, I add a medical mask. Is there a point here I’m missing?

I did not think it was yet definitive that the virus originated in a lab. If I am not mistaken, the subject is still being debated. But who gives a shit? How does that change how we emerge from this pandemic?

What annoys me is that you guys let morons continually spew shit here about malaria and stomach worm drugs, and the “dangers” of the vaccines. In your own little way, you’re helping to prolong the pandemic. Congratulations.

As you ignored the central thesis of my post I will repeat it for you -- please explain what standard should be used to censor ideas you disagree with, ideas you don't like. And please be specific.

 

[maxinger]

anti-vaxxers have a very strong view.
However, they are not dangerous as we are expected to
know what is good & what is bad, what is fact & what is fiction.


anti-vaxxers are also attention seekers.
So don't please them by giving them attention.