Wife hung fake Picasso after taking real thing amid contentious divorce

Rich, money wise, yet so incredibly poor in happiness and contentment in life. That sums up Bill Gross. Not did he only lie to multiple top executives at PIMCO, wrongly accused them and conducted himself like a maniac, apparently he also made his family's life to a hell too. Sad when some people are so preoccupied with money and wealth that they completely check out of friendships, family, and the other truly valuable things in life.

Living

Wife hung fake Picasso after taking real thing amid contentious divorce
By Carleton English

May 11, 2018 | 10:18pm | Updated

Modal Trigger
signed-picasso-mistress.jpg

'Le Repos' painting by Pablo Picasso Sothebys.com

A woman locked in a contentious divorce with her bond-trader husband took a Picasso off his wall — and replaced it with a forgery she made herself.

Sue Gross didn’t wait until she and Wall Street titan Bill Gross had finalized their split, swapping out a 1932 Pablo Picasso painting entitled “Le Repos” hanging in their bedroom with her own rendering.

The original is expected to fetch as much as $35 million at Sotheby’s Monday evening.

The painting, which depicts Picasso lover Marie-Thérèse Walter, had belonged to them jointly. But a coin flip in August 2017 — amid the couple’s divorce proceedings — awarded Sue full custody of Picasso’s depiction of his sleeping mistress, which the couple had owned since 2006.

After the flip, Bill Gross tried to make arrangements for the piece to be transferred from his Laguna Beach, Calif., house to his ex-wife, sources told The Post.

But the ex-Mrs. Gross said that was unnecessary — she already had taken the real thing.

The couple’s art collection had been appraised by Sotheby’s in January 2017 amid the divorce proceedings, but Bill learned only later the Picasso was appraised in a different location than Laguna Beach.

“Bill was shocked Sue already had the piece,” a source said, adding that Bill said, “She stole the damn thing.”

In November testimony, the ex-wife readily admitted to swiping the Picasso, citing an e-mail Bill sent to her where he instructed her to “take all the furniture and art that you’d like.”

“And so I did,” she said.

But it wasn’t quite that simple, as testimony revealed the ex-wife’s prowess for both painting and artful deception.

“Well, you didn’t take it and leave an empty spot on the wall, though, did you?” lawyers for Bill Gross asked.

“No,” Sue responded.

“You replaced it with a fake?” the lawyer asked.

“Well, it was a painting I painted,” Sue responded.

“A replication of the Picasso?” the lawyer asked.

“A replication, yes,” Sue answered.

“And it had the Picasso signature and everything, didn’t it?” the lawyer asked.

“Not exactly . . .” she said.

“Whose signature was it? Sue Gross?” the lawyer asked.

“I don’t remember how I signed it. Bill will remember because I painted it at home years ago,” she said.

“Did you tell him that you took the Picasso?” the lawyer asked.

“No. We didn’t speak for a year and a half,” she answered just before the line of questioning turned to a 7-foot, 300-pound rabbit sculpture she also admitted taking.

But the Picasso’s disappearance shouldn’t have been a total surprise for the bond king. Bill Gross had said that several items disappeared from the house, such as a Tiffany clock, 20 bottles of wine, Christmas decorations and a 1,000-pound-statue, The Orange County Register reported in October.

Gross also had previously praised his ex-wife’s painting ability. In a June 2015 investor outlook letter for Janus Capital, where he now works, Gross admitted that his then-wife was “the artist in the family.”

“[Sue] likes to paint replicas of some of the famous pieces, using an overhead projector to copy the outlines and then just sort of fill in the spaces,” Gross wrote.

“’Why spend $20 million?’ she’d say — ‘I can paint that one for $75,’ and I must admit that one fabulous Picasso with signature ‘Sue,’ heads the fireplace mantle in our bedroom,” Bill continued, referring to a different artwork.

The Gross divorce was finalized on Oct. 6, 2017.

Lawyers for Sue did not respond to multiple requests for comment. Reps for Bill Gross declined to comment.

https://nypost.com/2018/05/11/wife-hung-fake-picasso-after-taking-real-thing-amid-contentious-divorce/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site buttons&utm_campaign=site buttons
 
Can't disagree more. There are millions of fathers who provide very well for their families, afford the kids private school, college, holidays, hobbies but above all else TIME. And those fathers understand there is a trade off of some sorts. But by far not as pronounced as you suggest. The law of diminishing returns does not kick in on a pizza level. It kicks in on the multi million dollar income level. At some point a man has to make a choice, give it all up in favor of his own career or hold onto a very comfortable and good position yet reserve time and all else for the family. A guy who can't even balance and juggle that does not deserve to earn millions of dollars.

You take the good w/ the bad. Had he been someone else, his wife and kids would have been sitting in their 3 bedroom ranch waiting for him to bring pizza home everyday.
 
Can't disagree more. There are millions of fathers who provide very well for their families, afford the kids private school, college, holidays, hobbies but above all else TIME. And those fathers understand there is a trade off of some sorts. But by far not as pronounced as you suggest. The law of diminishing returns does not kick in on a pizza level. It kicks in on the multi million dollar income level. At some point a man has to make a choice, give it all up in favor of his own career or hold onto a very comfortable and good position yet reserve time and all else for the family. A guy who can't even balance and juggle that does not deserve to earn millions of dollars.

I don't judge, brother, I leave that to the people who claim to be tolerant and non-judgemental.
 
Exactly why the majority of Americans declare Trump unfit for office. Someone who cannot manage his "home affairs" can't be entrusted with hundreds of millions of people and his promises and commitments will be highly questioned by anyone outside the country alike. Just one example where a man's standing and capacity is measured by how he conducts his personal affairs.

I don't judge, brother, I leave that to the people who claim to be tolerant and non-judgemental.
 
Last edited:
Exactly why the majority of Americans declare Trump unfit for office. Someone who cannot be faithful to his own wife can't be entrusted with hundreds of millions of people and his promises and commitments will be highly questioned by anyone outside the country alike. Just one example where a man's standing and capacity is measured by how he conducts his personal affairs.

I wouldn't care if he was sacrificing babies as long as he signed that tax reform bill.
 
You can bet there's another one waiting in line to take half of whatever he has left ...

What makes you think there is not another one who would be taking what she has? That Picasso's worth $35 million. I am sure someone would've paid attention. LOL Unless she has some other real skills besides forging art, I would say she would be in a worse situation than her ex. At least Mr. Gross can still make all the money back trading bonds.
 
Exactly why the majority of Americans declare Trump unfit for office. Someone who cannot manage his "home affairs" can't be entrusted with hundreds of millions of people and his promises and commitments will be highly questioned by anyone outside the country alike. Just one example where a man's standing and capacity is measured by how he conducts his personal affairs.

That is NOT true. Plenty of people, men AND women have/had a mess of or empty family/personal affairs and had done great wonders for mankind. How good and balanced a person's family/personal affairs or lack thereof is NOT a good barometer of the quality of that person's career/professional/public contribution. Everybody is different.
 
Does not sound like she forged anything. It sounds more like one of her hobbies was painting. Bill was pissed he had art hanging at home that he had no idea was the original or the work of an amateur (and I guess most filthy rich people who collect things to show off or just because they simply have no clue where else to waste their money on have no clue either). Bill Gross clearly stated beforehand that she can take whatever she wants, and so she did. Legally he has zero recourse. He appears to be angry for the wrong reasons. Muhamed El-Erin is one of the absolutely most trustworthy, professional, and ethical as well as successful guys in the industry. Gross treated his cohead like garbage. I can only repeat, most often one's true character shines through whether in private or public. It's hard to hide that.

He was fired and ousted from Pimpco for the exact same lack of falsely directed anger and abuse of colleagues.

What makes you think there is not another one who would be taking what she has? That Picasso's worth $35 million. I am sure someone would've paid attention. LOL Unless she has some other real skills besides forging art, I would say she would be in a worse situation than her ex. At least Mr. Gross can still make all the money back trading bonds.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top