Quote from mokwit:
75BP was to stop the Chimp giving his 'State of the Union" speech on the 28th against a '87 backdrop. Bernanke seems aware that he cannot cut much more but didn't want another thrashing from Wall St for being a bad poodle. He is probably cringing at the thought of another whipping to come if he does not cut and hoping his masters won't whip him if he cuts 25BP on 30th. Poor clueless academic sap probably thought he would be the one settiing policy when he took the job no one else was stupid enough to take.
Alternatively if Wall St is short after using the rate cuts support to reverse then we may see no cut and an attempt to break the market.
Seems to me it's more about Realpolitik than fundamentals. Banks vs Hedge funds.
Quote from S2007S:
was listening to fast money last night and one of them mentioned, (new guy that comes on the show every now and then) mentioned that he sees the markets going up until the end of JAN so that hedge funds can show better results on their returns, said that hedge funds would be pushing the markets higher.....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote from canuckrookie:
I saw that segment also. How about the comment from pop&drops dilon comments that it's good to fight with your spouse and one of the guys says "first a pop then she drops" LOL. Watching the circus on CNBC is better than the comedy network.
Quote from Surdo:
Stop trying to predict what "might happen" and trade the fucking tape. I can count the number of actual traders here on one hand.
A real trader can trade long or short at any given moment and does not really give a rat's ass which way the river is flowing as long as he is in the boat.
This Châteauneuf du Pape tastes oh so nice.
Quote from mokwit:
Poor clueless academic sap probably thought he would be the one settiing policy when he took the job no one else was stupid enough to take.
Quote from mokwit:
Seems to me it's more about Realpolitik than fundamentals. Banks vs Hedge funds.