I dont care about "studies" because none of those studies approach the mkt the same way I do with respect to TA so their findings arent relevant to me.
The ONLY thing that matters to me is that I know how to make TA work for me everyday. For those that havent learned what works for them, I can understand the skepticism but fortunately there are many many ways to use TA successfully. Just takes a good deal of observation. You HAVE to personalize it, I feel, in order to obtain consistency.
The ONLY thing that matters to me is that I know how to make TA work for me everyday. For those that havent learned what works for them, I can understand the skepticism but fortunately there are many many ways to use TA successfully. Just takes a good deal of observation. You HAVE to personalize it, I feel, in order to obtain consistency.
Quote from rcanfiel:
a) There are a large number of studies showing little value in classic TA when subjected to multiyear studies across markets, across many different parameter settings for TA indicators/methods.
b) The opposition, TAphiles, have little to prove that TA works, outside of anecdotal reports. In addition, even the CTAs (and many hedge funds) who are supposed to be the experts, struggle to perform well, examining most CTA annual performance reports.
c) I side with a) over b)