Why won't Palin talk to reporters?

trendlover · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from Yannis:

There was recently a case in California where a librarian lost her job because, after seeing someone looking at child pornography on the internet, called the police (the practice of frequenting those abusive sites is illegal.) Huge controversy, ginormous. Setting and policing library policy is not trivial, there's a lot of room for disagreement and misunderstandings here.

Since it is illegal to go to those sites, why was the librarian fired?

trendlover · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from omegapoint:

This is the sort of thing that conservatives describe as "Maverick"
When you do what you think is right and ignore the will of the people ...the town could just as well be the whole damn country
if she got into office. Again that dictatorship thing Newt so very
blatantly confirmed for us when he was speaker.

I can see is someone has done something they think is right (but ignores the will of the people) becasue it might help the country or the people as a whole. But if they do what they think is right and ingore the constitution just to push their own agenda, then that is dictatorship disguised as maverick.

trendlover · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from Yannis:

On the other hand, something inside tells me that perhaps ALL politicians are basically arrogant liars. Since you can't find a good one, the challenge is to choose the least evil one, the one who would do the least damage, and, maybe, help a little. Sounds pessimistic, right?

No not pessimistic, it is how it looks to me in this campaign. Not pessimistic, but realistic.

Fractals 'R Us · Sep 5, 2008

Palin would go on the Oprah show..... if Oprah would have her. Oprah is afraid to put her on!! She had Obama on but her excuse for not having Palin on is about "not endorsing a candidate" LOL. That is lame even for the left........

Pa(b)st Prime · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from trendlover:

I can see is someone has done something they think is right (but ignores the will of the people) becasue it might help the country or the people as a whole. But if they do what they think is right and ingore the constitution just to push their own agenda, then that is dictatorship disguised as maverick.

I must of missed the amendment but I didn't see anything in the Constitution giving me a right to view anything I'd like in a public library.

Obviously somebody somewhere acts as an arbiter of library content or less I'd be able to read this months Lithuanian Lolitas.

I'd suggest this for those who can't find a "banned" book. There's a site called amazon.com. They ship. Even to Alaska.

Pa(b)st Prime · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from trendlover:

I can see is someone has done something they think is right (but ignores the will of the people) becasue it might help the country or the people as a whole. But if they do what they think is right and ingore the constitution just to push their own agenda, then that is dictatorship disguised as maverick.

Who bans free speech more than the Left?

Try in Germany saying that the Holocaust is an exaggeration.

If in Canada try writing Muslims are an immense source of terror .

Don't even THINK about calling someone a nappy-headed 'ho on radio.

Who invented âhate crimesâ? And now hate speech.

Did Mike Moore or Al Franken or George Soros even once ever need complain about repeated IRS audits or visa problems ect.?

I mean really where do you get your stupid friggin' thoughts from? I'm serious.

trendlover · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

I must of missed the amendment but I didn't see anything in the Constitution giving me a right to view anything I'd like in a public library.

Obviously somebody somewhere acts as an arbiter of library content or less I'd be able to read this months Lithuanian Lolitas.

I'd suggest this for those who can't find a "banned" book. There's a site called amazon.com. They ship. Even to Alaska.

What I question is why Sarah Palin would fire a librarian who is said to be working at that library for I think 7 years, and who the town people were happy with. Just because the librarian refused to agree to banning something Sarah Palin might not like? I am not questioning the right to view anything in a library, I am questing Sarah Palin possibly using her power to remove someone who does not fit in her plan, and maybe her disregard for peoples right to question her.
ps If you want a copy of Lolitas monthly, I will send to you Pabst.

Pa(b)st Prime · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from trendlover:

What I question is why Sarah Palin would fire a librarian who is said to be working at that library for I think 7 years, and who the town people were happy with. Just because the librarian refused to agree to banning something Sarah Palin might not like? I am not questioning the right to view anything in a library, I am questing Sarah Palin possibly using her power to remove someone who does not fit in her plan, and maybe her disregard for peoples right to question her.
ps If you want a copy of Lolitas monthly, I will send to you Pabst.

Thank's

And point taken. You do have a right to know about the book.

trendlover · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Thank's And point taken. You do have a right to know about the book.

Yes, because Sarah felt so strongly about the banning issue, she fired an allegedly good worker who people of the town liked, so that raises curiosity of what Sarah does not want people to see in the library.

lilduckling · Sep 5, 2008

Quote from trendlover:

Yes, because Sarah felt so strongly about the banning issue, she fired an allegedly good worker who people of the town liked, so that raises curiosity of what Sarah does not want people to see in the library.

Here is the list the right has been trying to ban for decades.......
http://www.librarian.net/stax/2366/sarah-palin-vp-nominee/#comment-119807

I've been warning you all how dangerous the loony religious right and evangelicals are .... its all fun and games till one of them gets elected!!!

by the way a few days back i posted how these groups protested "Harry Potter"........ sure as shit one of the books on the list was Harry Potter!!!

Ladies and gentlemen of ET...... i ask you, who is more of a danger to our future.....Osama Bin Laden or these crazy mentally deranged evangelicals?????

LIVE FREE OR DIE!!