Why We Should Never Compromise On Gun Rights

[AAAintheBeltway]

You may want to check the NRA’s tax return to double check what you’re saying. Here’s the nra tax return from 2013:

http://990s.foundationcenter.org/990_pdf_archive/530/530116130/530116130_201312_990O.pdf

It's almost like someone has armed you with a bunch of talking points, but that would mean you're another soros tool. Not you, no, say it isn't so.

I'm not even sure what you're challenging. That a Board runs the NRA and it is elected by the membership? Your real problem, or should I say Soros' real problem, is not with the NRA or gun manufacturers, but with the fact that the membership is made up of people you despise. The "deplorables" and "bitter enders" that Obama and Clinton liked to mock for the amusement of Hollywood elites.

 

[UsualName]

It's almost like someone has armed you with a bunch of talking points, but that would mean you're another soros tool. Not you, no, say it isn't so.

I'm not even sure what you're challenging. That a Board runs the NRA and it is elected by the membership? Your real problem, or should I say Soros' real problem, is not with the NRA or gun manufacturers, but with the fact that the membership is made up of people you despise. The "deplorables" and "bitter enders" that Obama and Clinton liked to mock for the amusement of Hollywood elites.

Th NRA is one thing to its member, a feat of inducing propaganda machine, and another to the gun manufacturers, a money making political lobbyist.

I think you and i talked about the way the members view the nra before and you made the analogy that the nra is like the naacp of the right. I actually think that’s fair.

The naacp is a membership organization but doesn’t always reflect the will of its members in policy and action. The nra is the same way. They are the worst of the worst though. They are the swamp and their agenda leads to thousands of deaths every year.

 

[Poindexter]

They are the swamp and their agenda leads to thousands of deaths every year.

The NRA's agenda, UsefulIdiot, is on page 2 of their tax form that you posted a link to: "TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE U S CONSTITUTION." No surprise that you and other shitlibs think that's a bad thing.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

The naacp is a membership organization but doesn’t always reflect the will of its members in policy and action. The nra is the same way. They are the worst of the worst though. They are the swamp and their agenda leads to thousands of deaths every year.

You're just dead wrong. Name one policy the NRA pushes that the majority of their membership opposes.

I am getting a little tired of your repeated slanders of responsible gun owners. You are beginning to sound like that little shit David Hogg. The NRA is not the one demanding open borders so drug gangs like MS 13 can run wild. That was Obama. They are not the ones demanding that schools stop disciplining violent minority thugs. That was Obama. They're not the ones ignoring repeated warnings about terrorists. That's the FBI and sheriff's department.

 

[UsualName]

You're just dead wrong. Name one policy the NRA pushes that the majority of their membership opposes.

I am getting a little tired of your repeated slanders of responsible gun owners. You are beginning to sound like that little shit David Hogg. The NRA is not the one demanding open borders so drug gangs like MS 13 can run wild. That was Obama. They are not the ones demanding that schools stop disciplining violent minority thugs. That was Obama. They're not the ones ignoring repeated warnings about terrorists. That's the FBI and sheriff's department.

It’s ok to get tired.

The nra and responsible gun owners are two different things. The nra opposed banning bump stocks and prohibiting people on the no fly list from buying guns. I have a hard time believing the majority of nra members agree with that.

The fact that your trying to change the subject shows you’re having a hard time defending the nra and that’s good. People really need to start taking a closer look at their money and legislative positions. They are extreme to a fault that has horrendous consequences.

In my opinion, they mislead their supporters with faulty logic. Take for example the slogan “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” That’s not logical because it doesn’t address the problem of the nra is a major reason bad guys are able to get guns. We need to stop bad people from getting guns and that doesn’t mean good people can’t have guns either.

At the end of the day all they want is more guns in America, the bigger and more deadly the better because that’s where the biggest profit margins are. Bigger clips to fire more bullets to sell more bullets.

 

[futurecurrents]

The NRA's agenda, UsefulIdiot, is on page 2 of their tax form that you posted a link to: "TO PROTECT AND DEFEND THE U S CONSTITUTION." No surprise that you and other shitlibs think that's a bad thing.

Wow, what a typical braindead righty sheep you are.

Page 2 of the NRA handbook actually says "To protect the possession of toys of scared impotent little boys because they like to play with them and feel powerful."


Besides, banning handguns and assault rifles is legal within the current constitution. Which we can always change. The constitution has been changed before. It's old and out of date, like your dimwitted ideology.

 

[RedDuke]

....
Besides, banning handguns and assault rifles is legal within the current constitution. Which we can always change. The constitution has been changed before. ....

There lies an interesting issue. Right wing gun owners only like the parts of constitution that suits them, similar to evangelicals and the bible. The constitution can be amended, and 2nd amendment is not set in stone. While personally, I will fight tooth and nail for the right to own the gun, should we lose, being a law abiding citizen, I will turn my gun to authorities. Very few on the right would, thus proving they only support constitution if it suit their agenda.

 

[Tom B]

 

[CaptainObvious]

The people should not sacrifice their 2nd amendment rights for the same reason we should fight for our 4th amendment rights and our 1st amendment rights, and every other constitutional right. When the government and corporate America invades our privacy, we say, hey, I'm an honest guy with nothing to hide. We know the result. We have no privacy. When the leftist mob shouts down an opposing view, riots when necessary to dominate the conversation, we say, fuck'em, didn't want to talk to them anyway. We know the result. Allegation is now considered fact. Now they want the 2nd amendment. We say, hey, I don't hunt and live in a safe neighborhood. We know what's coming. What happens to a people who have no privacy rights, and live in a world where any nitwit, or government agent can make up charge they like and it will be considered enough for the mob to find you guilty? What happens to a people where the media endorses and advocates such action? What happens to a people who are hoodwinked into believing that public safety can be guaranteed by a corrupt and incompetent government when it's painfully obvious they can't? What happens to a people where the rights of criminals are considered more important than the lives of their victims. What happens when those people have no way to defend themselves against such violence and oppression?

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

What happens when those people have no way to defend themselves against such violence and oppression?

You mean, like in the UK now? Where the police ignore child rape on a massive scale to avoid upsetting muslims and instead concentrate on rooting out anti-immigration internet posters and arresting them in predawn raids?