Why We Should Never Compromise On Gun Rights
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
What if they came for your boy?
What if they came for your boy?
Stevens article promoting the repeal of the 2nd amendment reveals several things.
-that gun confiscation is what it was always about. And that fact should be brought out in court when gun control laws are challenged. (just as liberal judges claim that what legislative allies said mattered when it came to the 6 nation immigration ban)
-a tacit admission that gun control legislation is barred by the 2nd amendment
-the 2nd amendment recognizes a natural, inalienable right. Repealing the 2nd amendment does not extinguish that right.
-that gun confiscation is what it was always about. And that fact should be brought out in court when gun control laws are challenged. (just as liberal judges claim that what legislative allies said mattered when it came to the 6 nation immigration ban)
-a tacit admission that gun control legislation is barred by the 2nd amendment
-the 2nd amendment recognizes a natural, inalienable right. Repealing the 2nd amendment does not extinguish that right.
I wonder how you would describe the Obama administration then, since it ran an operation that, incredibly, was designed to funnel guns from legitimate dealers to Mexican cartels? And that resulted in the deaths of law enforcement personnel on both sides of the border. Obama's despicable Attorney General, Eric Holder, was held in contempt of congress for his role in covering it up and refusing to produce relevant documents.
Our government does stuff like that all the time. There’s agents that infiltrate drug cartels, terror organizations, foreign governments. There’s always a high level of risk when going after people like that. These missions and operations are hard to defend but in a lot of cases it takes a lot of risk to get to the target.
Eric Holder nor Obama ever needed a lawyer while in office.