Why was the "Objections to SCT" thread closed?

Quote from Thunderdog:

As an aside, Dr. Deco, your reference to the B-Team, while contextually accurate, may turn out to be an unfortunate term of reference in the fullness of time. Jack's gaggle of lawyers may deem at some point that we are engaging in copyright or trademark infringement. Coincidentally, as it happens, the entirely appropriate "B-Team" moniker sounds a lot like like the "BE-DO-HAVE Team," and may be misconstrued as an abbreviated reference for same. So you can see the potential for misunderstanding.
best post ever from TD !
 
I can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I first used the term B-Team. Or one of me did, ninetten searches could confirm that. I would be happy to license it to you for an appropriate honorarium. Jack is an inveterate intellectual thief. He pretends to ignore you, then after an indecent interval he steals your stuff.
 
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. First let's see what kind of standstill or forbearance offer Pissy comes in with. My people are already accessing Google Earth and MapQuest in search of a suitable drop point. It seems I have to do everything.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Oh, really? I thought Jack frowned on, and ridiculed, what he refers to as "conventional orthdoxy," that being anything non-Jack. And anyone who doesn't think as Jack does, is thinking inside the box, according to Jack, and is in desperate need of one of his "paradigm shifts." So, if this is the case, then why would anyone want to begin a few steps backwards by learning something he would then have to unlearn once he started Jacking? Pissy, you may wish to confer with Jack before issuing your proclamation about The Great One and His Grand Vision.


People post as they please.

This post any several following posts are missing several points.

These respondants are mistakenly assuming that they were mentioned in the post they are dickering with. They were not included in tht post in any way.

Those who ARE mentioned do not post in ET formally.

With regard to ancillary knowledge, it is obvious from most literature that to maintain an outstanding money velocity in markets dominated by an alternative stategy, that the strategy has to be known, understood and trumped.

There is an corrolary aspect of what spyder is doing that is not often acknowledged. Certainly this application, a merger of sorts, is congruent and synergistic.

As 2007 unfolds, there will be a host of new information coming to the fore and a lot more will be apparent.

The orientation of the two trading structures (paradigms) and their overlap and Venn orientation is introduced in Harris in his heirarchy of trader distribution.

I have directly and by terminology (conventional) shown these relationships, some intimate. So I am not going to rehearse the litany here and now.

It is corny to think that those who run the industry in their paradigm are represented here in ET by the likes of those giggling with their current misconceptions about who and what they are or respresent. Lets return to to the giggles and games guys; focus on what you think you know on the beginner level.

You guys were not the reference in the prior post. Experts in the conventional orthodoxy and who control the game on their side are what and who dominates the media. They were the guys offing low three digits per hour portal to portal in 1960.
 
And which paradigm do you represent, Jack? The pied piper paradigm?
Quote from jack hershey:

People post as they please.

This post any several following posts are missing several points.

These respondants are mistakenly assuming that they were mentioned in the post they are dickering with. They were not included in tht post in any way.

Those who ARE mentioned do not post in ET formally.

With regard to ancillary knowledge, it is obvious from most literature that to maintain an outstanding money velocity in markets dominated by an alternative stategy, that the strategy has to be known, understood and trumped.

There is an corrolary aspect of what spyder is doing that is not often acknowledged. Certainly this application, a merger of sorts, is congruent and synergistic.

As 2007 unfolds, there will be a host of new information coming to the fore and a lot more will be apparent.

The orientation of the two trading structures (paradigms) and their overlap and Venn orientation is introduced in Harris in his heirarchy of trader distribution.

I have directly and by terminology (conventional) shown these relationships, some intimate. So I am not going to rehearse the litany here and now.

It is corny to think that those who run the industry in their paradigm are represented here in ET by the likes of those giggling with their current misconceptions about who and what they are or respresent. Lets return to to the giggles and games guys; focus on what you think you know on the beginner level.

You guys were not the reference in the prior post. Experts in the conventional orthodoxy and who control the game on their side are what and who dominates the media. They were the guys offing low three digits per hour portal to portal in 1960.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

It is corny to think that those who run the industry in their paradigm are represented here in ET by the likes of those giggling with their current misconceptions about who and what they are or respresent. Lets return to to the giggles and games guys; focus on what you think you know on the beginner level.
Oh, how dismissive you can be. But then, that is within your purview as the Grande Dame of the New Orthodoxy.
 
haven't you grow tired of relentlessly attacking each other over personal views of the mkt?
i dont think jack's system works as he says myself but i dont harass him non stop every single day and dont get me wrong i questioned him a few times and harshly...maybe there's something of value to be found in those contorted posts of his and some people found it. if u didn't, too bad for you too good for the grobbers, give it up...the guy ain't gonna show u blotters and neither is backing down from his "teachings". waste of time, isn't it.
 
Quote from Bitstream:

...maybe there's something of value to be found in those contorted posts of his and some people found it...
Sure, why not? Say something often enough and with just the right amount of overbearing condescension, and it will be deemed to be true by a lot of people. (Consider the shit/wall analogy.)

As for why I do it, it is a spiritual journey for me. I grow as a person with each post.
 
I'd really like to help you out but can't since it would be against my policy.
Quote from Bitstream:

give it up...the guy ain't gonna show u blotters and neither is backing down from his "teachings". waste of time, isn't it.
 
Back
Top