Understandably. So just do what you, yourself, said you would do.Quote from Ivanovich:
A moderator won't be goaded to action, that much I'm sure of.
Quote from BernardRichards:
I wasn't talking about a President traitor assassination. I assumed it was a deserved fait accompli...
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=196224&perpage=6&pagenumber=1Quote from Ivanovich:
...discussing ANYTHING related to Presidential Assassination is not to be posted here.
Period.
...But persist in assassination commentary and I'll delete all the content, up to and including your username/posting privileges.
Quote from Gabfly1:
Just nibbling at the periphery, are you?
So what you are saying is that the earlier warning you gave in the Feedback thread was just farce. No, you won't censor the word "assassination." Slippery slope and all that. But what about referring to such a presidential assassination as a "deserved fait accompli" as the poster in question has done? How does that not meet your standard of the unacceptable insofar as your earlier warning about assassination references are concerned? Are you really a moderator, or are you just phoning it in?Quote from Ivanovich:
Gabfly,
I understand you don't like the OP. That's your business. But I'm not going to censor the word "assassination". Otherwise this will resemble the whole "don't throw stones just because he said Jehovah" skit from Life of Brian.
So you can post links, and try to steer action in a particular way, but I'll edit/delete how I see fit in my attempt to best enforce the rules of this website, until such a time (if ever) when Baron/Joe decides to remove my moderator status.
Feel free to have the last word.
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
It would appear some people don't take their beat downs like a man, they have to whine about it on message boards...
"Oh whoa is me, my thread was censored!!! Waaahhhh, Waaaahhhh, Wahhhhhhhhh."
Perhaps old Bernie could take his keyboard and go to a new game...
Or try the feedback section...
