why voters are angry in one graph

Quote from Scataphagos:

Well, you SHOULD be. The Tea Party represents the BEST of America and American spirit... just as it did in Boston Harbor...
More...

I actually just changed to Unaffiliated if you want to know. I am loyal to no party. If more people do the same I believe there can be real change.
 
I agree both parties really suck hard.
We need to stop lobbying.
We need to go back to the original framework and have the state legislators elect the senators.

Those senators must represent the states interests not be available for purchase by lobbyists or the President.
 
Quote from dandxg:

I actually just changed to Unaffiliated if you want to know. I am loyal to no party. If more people do the same I believe there can be real change.
More...

Well, the Tea Party isn't really a party... not like they will have any candidates... And while the Boston Tea Party wasn't really a party in any sense either, the American of today's Tea Party is the same as before.

We'll probably never have a genuine political Tea Party... The majority of Americans are too gullible and politically naive to see themselves as anything other than Repub or Dem.
 
Quote from Trader666:

Typical libtard response. You implied it was from Heritage just like you're doing here.

You're lamely trying to hide the fact that those projections are from the Obama Administration because you have nothing intelligent to say.

How pathetic.
More...

You are telling me that Obama administration is proposing budgets for the year 2020 and those are not projected numbers? Hahaha :D
 
Quote from Trader666:

Troll? YOU'RE still peddling the same lame libtard lie that not even Obama would attempt. The data is NOT from Heritage, it's from the CEA and OMB, both part of the Executive Office of the President. In other words, FROM THE OBAMA ADMNISTRATION. And that's clearly marked on the chart. So spare us your baseless Heritage hysteria.
More...

Trader666, are you truly this dumb or are you a troll? First of all, Obama came president in 2008. Then how the heck does a chart to 2020 matter? I think Obama will at most be chosen a second term. This means in 2016 a republican will spend more then a democrat, like they have done so in the past! (see my charts!)

What your chart proves is that both republican and democrats are spendtrifts, however based on the charts I showed you republicans are a bit more spendthrift, thats why I said 60% their fault debt bubble and democrats 40% fault.
 
Democrat: Obama is the ONE! He's going to SAVE us!!

Republican: The guy running against Obama is the ONE! He's going to SAVE us!!

Realist: What a bunch of f-ing idiots...
 
What part of "those projections are from the Obama Administration" didn't you understand? Get a life troll.

Quote from hermit:

You are telling me that Obama administration is proposing budgets for the year 2020 and those are not projected numbers? Hahaha :D
More...
 
LOLOL!!! You reveal more of your ignorance with every post. Those projections are from your beloved Obama Administration and they matter because they reflect the future costs of the debt that Obama is racking up with his socialist welfare state agenda. Which you are desperate to defend. Are you really so naive to think that after Obama leaves office all his crappy programs will simply evaporate?

Quote from failed_trad3r:

First of all, Obama came president in 2008. Then how the heck does a chart to 2020 matter?
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top