Why trading educators talk about entries 95% of the time?

Wrong on so many levels. im playing his exact strategy and we have the same number of contracts always. the dufference is im cutting losses he isnt

paper losses are still losses! im realizing my paper loss sooner so i can get in a minute later saving 1 point on possibly 3 positions which would be 150 dollars! remember volpri is always carrying his max position and it only grows as he loses more. my average price in the end will always be lower than his because of my exit n lower renter. now slippage n fees sure those must be accounted for but my risk is way less because when i bail for good. ive already saved a lot by realizing my losses. whereas he didnt so he gets the total loss and i get my savings minus fees n slippage.
Got to think through what u say. Im saying if volpre adds theSame amount of contracts as u do on each of your entries hevwould have more than u cause he never jettison his first entri es. Correct?
 
I for one believe if your ent
I don't care how great you think your entries are, you'll never
get more than 60% correct with equal stop and target. And thats amazing!
And highly unlikely and am not even sure its possible long term.

Don't you think they should devote vast majority of time talking
about how to manage a trade once your in? But they dont.

They just say, look at this great setup and this is a good setup blah blah.

All the while I'm looking at these so called setups and can easily
tell they are a coin flip at best, maybe barely better than a coin flip.
And I mean barely.
May I ask what you are trading...and how you entry. If so by signal, then my next question is by how you view orders in the bars to determine if the entry is feasible. It is not about managing a bad trade...its about winning a profitable trade.
 
Got to think through what u say. Im saying if volpre adds theSame amount of contracts as u do on each of your entries hevwould have more than u cause he never jettison his first entri es. Correct?
no. we always have the same.
volpei...buys 1 buy 1 he has 2 buys 1 he has 3 buys 1 he has 4 buys 1 he has 5.
me. i buy 1. sell 1...buy 2 sell 2. buy 3 sell 3 buy 4 sell 4 buy 5 sell 5
 
Last edited:
...I have a friend who has some long term investments. When all the markets dropped because of this covid thing he called the managers of the fund. He was thinking of possibly changing some things. They recommended he leave it as was. Then it began to come back.

I don’t know for sure if he averaged down and bought more on the drop but if he did he is probably sitting ok.

Basically that is the basis that dozu888 has argued for. I rail jokingly on him a bit but he is absolutely correct and will be vindicated. We will soon see all time highs again. And he will be proclaiming himself again a master trader and the rest as idiots.

See the similar forces are at work intraday. The TF and holding time is just different. You could look at averaging down intraday as cost-averaging but intraday. Scaling in sounds more PC but it is nothing less than just plain old averaging down...

Typical investor / fund is diversified in their investments...its not just one investment.

In contrast, the typical trader is only trading one trading instrument but some do trade a basket of different trading instruments at the same time.

--------------

Typical investor is less dependent upon their investments as a source of earning a living.

In contrast, the typical trader is more dependent upon trading as a source of income (e.g. full-time, part-time...2nd source of income).

--------------

Simply, the key issue here is the market context for the investor versus the market context for the trader. Therefore, its not similar forces.

For example, a trader that took a Long position prior to the Pandemic and held it as a loser and continue averaging down (adding to his/her Long position)...

You forgot to mention the other variable that involves the Broker (their risks) versus the account size of the trader. Thus, the broker will issue a margin call and then close the position regardless to what the trader wants to do (continue with the average down philosophy).

My point, the typical investor is investing for different reasons in comparison to the typical trader that is trading for different reasons. The difference is then magnified by the broker.

A investor can Buy at 100 and then Buy more at 1 at a very cheap discount...the investor will not get a margin call. Also, the investor can hold the losing investment for many years if needed and add other investments to their portfolio.

Risk of Ruin (black swan event)

In contrast, a trader can't do that...the trader will get a margin call long before it reaches 1. Also, I don't remember hearing about you having a basket of different trades at the same time to minimize the risk of ruin.

In other words, completely different forces at work intraday and a poor explanation (excuse) for averaging down in trading via the investment analogy.

wrbtrader
 
Last edited:
Typical investor / fund is diversified in their investments...its not just one investment.

In contrast, the typical trader is only trading one trading instrument but some do trade a basket of different trading instruments at the same time.

--------------

Typical investor is less dependent upon their investments as a source of earning a living.

In contrast, the typical trader is more dependent upon trading as a source of income (e.g. full-time, part-time...2nd source of income).

--------------

Simply, the key issue here is the market context for the investor versus the market context for the trader. Therefore, its not similar forces.

For example, a trader that took a Long position prior to the Pandemic and held it as a loser and continue averaging down (adding to his/her Long position)...

You forgot to mention the other variable that involves the Broker (their risks) versus the account size of the trader. Thus, the broker will issue a margin call and then close the position regardless to what the trader wants to do (continue with the average down philosophy).

My point, the typical investor is investing for different reasons in comparison to the typical trader that is trading for different reasons. The difference is then magnified by the broker.

A investor can Buy at 100 and then Buy more at 1 at a very cheap discount...the investor will not get a margin call. Also, the investor can hold the losing investment for many years if needed and add other investments to their portfolio.

Risk of Ruin (black swan event)

In contrast, a trader can't do that...the trader will get a margin call long before it reaches 1. Also, I don't remember hearing about you having a basket of different trades at the same time to minimize the risk of ruin.

In other words, completely different forces at work intraday and a poor explanation (excuse) for averaging down in trading via the investment analogy.

wrbtrader
basically volpri says long term this mkt is bullish so get long and keep getting long averaging into your trades. my point is do we ever see him do a max loss in his journal and the do a double triple reverse??? nope. because he scrambled once i had him under the gun.

he even mentuoned some guy named dozu as if that would help his case? and said he would be proved right because mkt will go up.

thats his bias right there so when its low to him he buys n buys more holding all of it.

i say dump it all rebuy it all or u could dump half n rebuy half plus new to reduce risk.


volpri. i implore you to tell us what your max loss is when you exit all and reverse? and show us on one of your detailed charts otherwise you are just guessing or posting charts in hindsight.
typical.

his risk management is to keep buying more!! unlimited loss for small gains. anyone who worries about win loss percentage typically doesbt make much after fees n slippage
 
no. we always have the same.
volpei...buys 1 buy 1 he has 2 buys 1 he has 3 buys 1 he has 4 buys 1 he has 5.
me. i buy 1. sell 1...buy 2 sell 2. buy 3 sell 3 buy 4 sell 4 buy 5 sell 5
Whoa wait. I saying volpri follows your buying pattern buys 1, Buys 2, buys 3, buys 4. Volpre nows has 10 whereAs u have 5 to sell for profit once u get back your losses. Volpri lowered BE point plus making big bucks not little does once he gets above be. U just barely getting your Losses back and sone starbuck monies???
 
Whoa wait. I saying volpri follows your buying pattern buys 1, Buys 2, buys 3, buys 4. Volpre nows has 10 whereAs u have 5 to sell for profit once u get back your losses. Volpri lowered BE point plus making big bucks not little does once he gets above be. U just barely getting your Losses back and sone starbuck monies???
are you really not getting it or just fooling around. I always make more than volpri with the same strategy because we always have the same positions except he holds and has all the losing ticks while i avoid them
 
Re trading strategies one important consideration is the strength or lack thereof of the S&P and adjust accordingly.

Lately small choppy low VIX sessions and whipsaw days make it tough to scale consistently.
 
Back
Top