Quote from austinp:
<i>"what have you been smoking? of course there is relevance to the spread. a retailer who always enters at market and sells at market, will save money on a tighter spread."</i>
It's been awhile, but apparently what I smoked wasn't nearly strong as yours.
Explain mathematically how exactly you "pay" the spread? A retailer who enters at market and exits for anything less than the exact, specific, extreme tick DID NOT pay the spread. The spread was absorbed thru price movement outside of the round-trip trade.
If you buy at ES 1400.00 or 1399.75 or 1398.50 and exit for +4pts profit at a targeted exit, trailed stop or any other reason, what did you accomplish? You captured a +4pt trade.
Congratulations, job well done... and the distance of spread meant absolutely nothing. It could have been $12.50 wide, $25.00 wide or $100.00 wide. What do you care? You picked off $200 from inside the swing regardless of all else.
A retailer who buys & sells at the market does not save squat... if they are doing anything other than trying to scalp for ticks, which is a just loser's fallacy game in eminis to begin with.
Enjoy your skunk, we've been dry over here for decades now![]()
Let's "prove" this in a very simple way.
Assume the market is at 1400.00 /1400.25
you decide to go long at market , you buy at 1400.25 , immediately you want to close your position at market , you will be filled at 1400.00 ; you start out with a loss of 0.25 = the spread
The market needs to move 1 tick higher to 1400.25/1400.50 to break even.
Clear ?