I can't imagine how anyone can dispute that argument with a straight face.Quote from Trader666:
What you've described (curve fitting) is flawed backtesting. That's like saying hammers are worthless tools because driving screws with them doesn't work.
One can't use charts and also reasonably and intelligently dismiss backtesting because both use past data... only backtesting is more objective.
From the comments people have made it's clear they don't have even a basic understanding of backtesting. Not only do I KNOW for a fact that backtesting is a valid concept from my own experience, here's a quote from a world class trader on it... ignorant people will dismiss this as well but nobody who's ever posted on ET is even in the same league as William Eckhardt.
"I know of no way to validate conjectures concerning technical trading without back testing"
--William Eckhardt
... "with a straight face" being the operative phrase here.Quote from Thunderdog:
I can't imagine how anyone can dispute that argument with a straight face.

Quote from Trader666:
If the past is irrelevant as you claim, then so are charts. Checkmate idiot.
Quote from Trader666:
What you've described (curve fitting) is flawed backtesting. That's like saying hammers are worthless tools because driving screws with them doesn't work.
One can't use charts and also reasonably and intelligently dismiss backtesting because both use past data... only backtesting is more objective.
From the comments people have made it's clear they don't have even a basic understanding of backtesting. Not only do I KNOW for a fact that backtesting is a valid concept from my own experience, here's a quote from a world class trader on it... ignorant people will dismiss this as well but nobody who's ever posted on ET is even in the same league as William Eckhardt.
"I know of no way to validate conjectures concerning technical trading without back testing"
--William Eckhardt
Quote from MandelbrotSet:
So I leave you with this thought
Itâs plain for all to see
That jack hershey is a fool
And only a troll would disagree
A multi-alias troll
Who pretends to hide his anonymity
But posts in the exact same tone,
As all his other aliases
Is someone to be pitied, by you and me
They canât see beyond
Their raging Egos and Personalities
They demand to be right no matter what
And try to fight
When you wonât give them your trust
So donât take too seriously
The words of any of these Fools
For to do so would put you on their level
And make you, just like them,
A Tool
![]()


Quote from The General:
Can you at least quote a "new verse"-for you and your mandleson stooge are like violins.Quote from Trader666:
What you've described (curve fitting) is flawed backtesting. That's like saying hammers are worthless tools because driving screws with them doesn't work.
One can't use charts and also reasonably and intelligently dismiss backtesting because both use past data... only backtesting is more objective.
From the comments people have made it's clear they don't have even a basic understanding of backtesting. Not only do I KNOW for a fact that backtesting is a valid concept from my own experience, here's a quote from a world class trader on it... ignorant people will dismiss this as well but nobody who's ever posted on ET is even in the same league as William Eckhardt.
"I know of no way to validate conjectures concerning technical trading without back testing"
--William Eckhardt
Both of you-and a few more-are clueless idiots who would not know one end of a chart from another.
"But I know Mr.E"-ain't I a smart little toddler.
If you were to go on TV for "Am I smarter than a 10 year old"-you would more than likely win the prize for the most stupid contestant ever to be on the show.
As for mandleson-he is another one of the "clueless click"-and he is in fact nearly surpassing you-if that is possible?
The General
Quote from Trader666:
ROTFLMAO!!!! What an ignorANUS!!!
OK fool, show us your magic charts that are "past-free." Even the latest tick is the past by the time it shows up on your screen. And everything before it is ancient history.
As I said... one can't use charts and also reasonably and intelligently dismiss backtesting because both use past data... only backtesting is more objective.
A chart can show you what is happening now-which is far more important that what has happened-or what will happen.
