why this board isn't healthy if you trade for a living

"I'm not trying to control what Jack posts you idiot. But when he does I post reality checks."

LOL BUSTED Trader666.

Quote from Trader666:

And no, I didn't "admit" to any such thing you fool. You can't get anything right can you?
 
Quote from Eight:

I'm becoming more and more convinced that an internet forum is where the sickest of the sick can attain equality with the best of the best... almost any intelligent and well expressed post will get a response similar to gorillas throwing monkey shit at zoo visitors..

True, but I found the quotes from past posts to be extremely questionable. Deadbeat, maybe, but one with internet, and racist, without a doubt.
 
Quote from Trader666:

Beau, suma66 is a liar who got himself banned under the nic supermandel666 for posting gay porn in his attacks on the B Team. Which shows the quality of the arguments and people supporting Hershey. Just put the loser on iggy :p

P.S. Here's what happened when I challenged Jack to a trading contest:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1089241#post1089241
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1089742#post1089742
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1089925#post1089925
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1091102#post1091102

All this goes back to the thread about why Scottd couldn't make it work.

<i><b>WHY DOESN'T JACK'S METHOD WORK?</i></b>

It's only for .spx data in WL. Trying in any other platform will fail because the volume data is not the same. It's not ES data, it's a special .SPX dataset in WL. Traders optimizing outside will find different volume levels to be optimal, as well as making minor modifications to the script.

Anyway, I made some mods to the script, but dislike its risk characteristics, and need to see a couple more years of data, or at least a year of data to figure it out.
 
That's not the same as what you wrote at all you idiot. If it was I'd have 3X as many posts as I do.

"Trader666 clearly just admitted to following Jack around waiting for him to post so he can carry out his mission of "reality checking"
Quote from R. Raskolnikov:

"I'm not trying to control what Jack posts you idiot. But when he does I post reality checks."

LOL BUSTED Trader666.
 
Quote from Trader666:

That's not the same as what you wrote at all you idiot. If it was I'd have 3X as many posts as I do.

"Trader666 clearly just admitted to following Jack around waiting for him to post so he can carry out his mission of "reality checking"

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. It's a pretty childish comment.
 
Quote from bwolinsky:

All this goes back to the thread about why Scottd couldn't make it work.

<i><b>WHY DOESN'T JACK'S METHOD WORK?</i></b>
That is the $64,000 dollar question ... and one that has never been answered, LOL. :p
 
Quote from bwolinsky:

All this goes back to the thread about why Scottd couldn't make it work.

<i><b>WHY DOESN'T JACK'S METHOD WORK?</i></b>

It's only for .spx data in WL. Trying in any other platform will fail because the volume data is not the same. It's not ES data, it's a special .SPX dataset in WL. Traders optimizing outside will find different volume levels to be optimal, as well as making minor modifications to the script.

Anyway, I made some mods to the script, but dislike its risk characteristics, and need to see a couple more years of data, or at least a year of data to figure it out.

Question... have you moved on since you determined that Jacks method didnt work?
 
The guy who wrote it (who I affectionately refer to as "ratshit") is a failed Hershey trader... so he lacks common sense.
Quote from bwolinsky:

Yeah, that doesn't make any sense. It's a pretty childish comment.
 
Quote from Trader666:

That's not the same as what you wrote at all you idiot. If it was I'd have 3X as many posts as I do.
Everyone on the site knows the hershey stooges will go to no end to protect jack and enable his non-rationale ramblings on the meaning of trading, life and everything else! :p :D
 
Back
Top