Why there's a political divide with AGW belief

Quote from futurecurrents:

And you are simply wrong. To publicly state such a thing labels you as a fool. The science and evidence is overwhelming. By saying that AGW does not exist requires a breathtaking amount of stupidity and ignorance and/or delusion due to being manipulated as outlined in the article in the OP.

The sad thing is that you and your fellow denier moron buddies don't see it.

Of course Fox News never told you that CO2 levels are 35% higher due to man's burning of fossil fuels and that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. So maybe I should give you some slack. But now that you know it, what do you expect would happen?

Forty years from today ''global warming' will be viewed as the biggest scientific fraud pulled over the population of the earth. It will be regarded in the same way that the global cooling scare in the 1970s is viewed today. Scientists will attempt to deny their past assertions and ignore their previous papers in woeful attempts to escape the constant mocking of their global victims of bad policy but will find it difficult to evade their wrath in an internet driven age.
 
Quote from 377OHMS:

You are a drooling idiot and AGW does not exist, period.

Yammer all you want, nobody cares.

So although we are having temperatures and CO2 levels not seen in thousands of years, AGW does not exist. Sure. Someone is the drooling idiot here and it ain't me. (remember, co2 is a greenhouse gas)

Who's the idiot again?

You are one those AGW deniers referred to in the OP, a cultural identity one.

"Over time, belief in climate science has become less about the science than about establishing a cultural identity — you're a denier or a believer depending on whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, just like you're a Yankees or a Red Sox fan depending on whether you're from New York City or Boston. Of course, polarization is harmless in sports — and indeed, it can be essential to the fun. It's insanity as a basis for complex public policy."
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Forty years from today ''global warming' will be viewed as the biggest scientific fraud pulled over the population of the earth. It will be regarded in the same way that the global cooling scare in the 1970s is viewed today. Scientists will attempt to deny their past assertions and ignore their previous papers in woeful attempts to escape the constant mocking of their global victims of bad policy but will find it difficult to evade their wrath in an internet driven age.

So which irrefutable fact/s below do you deny?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas

Levels are 35% higher over the last 150 years

The CO2 is from man, mostly fossil fuel use.

The world is at temperatures not seen in over a thousand years.
2012 was the hottest year on record for the US.

The hottest 10 years on record have been in the last 15 years.


Please try to put aside your cultural identity and think logically.
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

Forty years from today ''global warming' will be viewed as the biggest scientific fraud pulled over the population of the earth. It will be regarded in the same way that the global cooling scare in the 1970s is viewed today. Scientists will attempt to deny their past assertions and ignore their previous papers in woeful attempts to escape the constant mocking of their global victims of bad policy but will find it difficult to evade their wrath in an internet driven age.
These idiots have set the reputation of academia back at least a century.

Tooth-fairy school of economics another 100 yrs.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

So which irrefutable fact/s below do you deny?

CO2 is a greenhouse gas

Levels are 35% higher over the last 150 years

The CO2 is from man, mostly fossil fuel use.

The world is at temperatures not seen in over a thousand years.
2012 was the hottest year on record for the US.

The hottest 10 years on record have been in the last 15 years.


Please try to put aside your cultural identity and think logically.

AGW doesn't exist.
 
Back
Top