Why there isn't a new republican revolution...

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

Maverick74, hapaboob, AAA....there were many who blindly supported Bush, mistake and blunder after another...

It is so ridiculously simple to do, yet none of them do it.

If your math was wrong before, don't use the same freaking math this time...

But that's what they do, they use the same math, over and over again and continue to get the wrong answer...

Quote from Landis82:

Same can be said of good old Maverick74 . . . one of the biggest Bush "cheerleaders" on ET, next to AAA of course. His rants in 2002 and 2003 were classic!

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

You think he personally prevented attacks in America?

What a Loony Tunes you are...

Warning! Danger Will Robinson...Danger!!!

You are like the robot on Lost in Space with your continual fear card crapola...

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I criticized him plenty. I defended him here when he was unfairly attacked. He made his share of mistakes, but let's not forget he got one thing very right. He prevented any more attacks after 9/11. Obama will be lucky to be able to say the same, particularly now that his first step has been to appease the nutcase loony wing of his party by going soft on terrorism.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from Landis82:

Do you really believe that Bush is actually responsible for preventing any further attacks after 9/11?

Have there been any attacks in the US since 9/11?

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

If there were any attacks tomorrow, who would be to blame?

Bush or Obama?

Quote from bugscoe:

Have there been any attacks in the US since 9/11?

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

If there were any attacks tomorrow, who would be to blame?

Bush or Obama?

Good lord. Since you imply in your above post, along with landis, that Bush wasn't responsible for keeping us safe, he wouldn't be responsible if we were attacked.

This is like playing chess with a 5 year old.

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

So Bush would not be responsible if we were attacked tomorrow?

Who would be responsible?

Quote from bugscoe:

Good lord. Since you imply in your above post, along with landis, that Bush wasn't responsible for keeping us safe, he wouldn't be responsible if we were attacked.

This is like playing chess with a 5 year old.

 

[Mercor]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

So Bush would not be responsible if we were attacked tomorrow?

Who would be responsible?

Clinton, of course.

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

Spoken like a true republican moron...

Quote from Mercor:

Clinton, of course.

 

[bugscoe]

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Spoken like a true republican moron...

Funny thing is, your logic excludes the very guy you're trying to blame. And now you're stuck.

 

[ZZZzzzzzzz]

You are stuck not answering the question...

If there were any attacks tomorrow, who would be responsible and to blame for those attacks? Bush or Obama...

Look, it ain't that hard, just like a multiple choice with two possible answers...

I promise I won't make fun of you when you make the wrong choice...

LOL!

Quote from bugscoe:

Funny thing is, your logic excludes the very guy you're trying to blame. And now you're stuck.