why there is no hope

[MathAndLogic]

Quote from Mav88:

Pelosi, Reid, Sharpton, and the unions say no cuts to entitlements, none whatsover.

We are back at 2007 level federal revenues but the federal spending is more than $1T higher. All those bullshit sudden ineffective 'stimulus' increases in medicare, disability, etc. are 'untouchable necessities' now. Proposed higher taxes won't come close to closing the gap.

The dishonesty of those miserable fuckers, I can never compromise with that shit. It is a socialist vote gathering scheme pure and simple- a one way political ratchet designed to crank up then scream about fairness when somebody wants it pulled back....

if any of you have delusions about some sort of grand compromise to save this place, forget it. Welcome to the end of liberty, this is what it looks like.

Your future looks like Italy but worse, imagine Italy with Brazil's race demographics, powerfully deadly. We need to split up into some sort of federation where each region can run it's entitlement system as it sees fit.

Why there is no hope? Because the government is robbing citizens' money in broad daylight with good intentions to provide free sex change operations !!! Yeeeeeeehaaaaaaa !!!!

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=253738&perpage=6&pagenumber=1

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Again Luke,we want people like you to leave.GO,GTFO,we dont need or want you.

So you think you're entitled to tell a productive responsible land owning tax payer. Who has been a US citizen longer than you. To GTFO of the country. But I'm not supposed to question the motive behind your presence on a trading web site when you've admitted you have no interest in trading?

Does that sum up the situation pretty well?

 

[Tsing Tao]

Quote from Lucrum:

So you think you're entitled to tell a productive responsible land owning tax payer. Who has been a US citizen longer than you. To GTFO of the country. But I'm not supposed to question the motive behind your presence on a trading web site when you've admitted you have no interest in trading?

Does that sum up the situation pretty well?

Not to mention there'd be a helluva lot more to a discussion where 61,173,739 people tell 58,167,260 (a good portion of the latter group being armed, by the way) to GFTO, we don't want you anymore. I wonder how that would end up.

 

[pspr]

Quote from Lucrum:

So you think you're entitled to tell a productive responsible land owning tax payer. Who has been a US citizen longer than you. To GTFO of the country. But I'm not supposed to question the motive behind your presence on a trading web site when you've admitted you have no interest in trading?

Does that sum up the situation pretty well?

And that's why we have a Republic and not a Democracy. Otherwise we would have slit IQ-47's neck shortly after birth if we even let it go that far.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from mrbill:

Just my way of saying I was wrong in this case. I'm not sure if they divide the number of posts by the number of days where actual posting takes place, or if the divide by the total number of days since we started. Not a big deal, I've been wrong before. Just curious as to the math.

Yes, I'm quoting myself here. I checked back to the date I started here, June 2012. Lucrum had about 4750 posts since then, less than 6 months. 25 per page for 188 pages per my new found friend 'search.'

At 8 posts per day x 180 days mine would be about 1540. So, Luke had about 3 times as many posts since that point in time. So, my gut feeling was right, and with his long time posting record, the numbers have been skewed.

And, FWIW, I am posting this with a smile. We're probably both on here too much.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from mrbill:

Yes, I'm quoting myself here. I checked back to the date I started here, June 2012. Lucrum had about 4750 posts since then, less than 6 months. 25 per page for 188 pages per my new found friend 'search.'

At 8 posts per day x 180 days mine would be about 1540. So, Luke had about 3 times as many posts since that point in time. So, my gut feeling was right, and with his long time posting record, the numbers have been skewed.

And, FWIW, I am posting this with a smile. We're probably both on here too much.

Have you alerted the media yet. They're always looking for a scoop.

 

[denner]

Quote from mrbill:

Yes, I'm quoting myself here. I checked back to the date I started here, June 2012. Lucrum had about 4750 posts since then, less than 6 months. 25 per page for 188 pages per my new found friend 'search.'

At 8 posts per day x 180 days mine would be about 1540. So, Luke had about 3 times as many posts since that point in time. So, my gut feeling was right, and with his long time posting record, the numbers have been skewed.

And, FWIW, I am posting this with a smile. We're probably both on here too much.

It must have been causing you sleepless nights, Don.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from Lucrum:

Have you alerted the media yet. They're always looking for a scoop.

As already noted, smiling all the way, Luke.

Have you started you trading gig with Patack yet?

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from mrbill:


Have you started you trading gig with Patack yet?

Yes. Unlike others who've taken it here though I'm only going to post performance midway thru and at the end.

 

[mrbill]

Quote from Lucrum:

Yes. Unlike others who've taken it here though I'm only going to post performance midway thru and at the end.

OK, that seem fair. No need to post daily IMO. Good Luck.