OP,
I don't mean to rain on your parade but you got any evidence to back your conclusions or are you just excited because the method works in hindsight ? This is precisely the main reason why so many people attack SCT, it's all claims, no substance.
Not trying to cause any stirs, just being brutally honest.
On the other hand, if you could please post what SCT is in basic form, I would appreciate it. Unfortunately, I'm too darn damn slow to learn from that journal, so many obscure words and concepts are used to overcomplicate trendlines and volume, I just lost it after 2-3 posts, threw the towel.
If this method is really good, someone needs to clean up the shit and come up with an easy to read document, not the bullshit that was presented.
Looking forward to your reply.
Daniel
I don't mean to rain on your parade but you got any evidence to back your conclusions or are you just excited because the method works in hindsight ? This is precisely the main reason why so many people attack SCT, it's all claims, no substance.
Not trying to cause any stirs, just being brutally honest.
On the other hand, if you could please post what SCT is in basic form, I would appreciate it. Unfortunately, I'm too darn damn slow to learn from that journal, so many obscure words and concepts are used to overcomplicate trendlines and volume, I just lost it after 2-3 posts, threw the towel.
If this method is really good, someone needs to clean up the shit and come up with an easy to read document, not the bullshit that was presented.
Looking forward to your reply.
Daniel
