Why should France have a veto right in the U.N. ?
- Thread starter freealways
- Start date
dgabriel, contrary to a widespread belief, the Nazis did not ´come to power by election in 1933, after several failed attempts in prior elections´.
on the legal basis of § 48 oft he Weimar constitution Hitler was appointed Reichskanzler (Imperial chancellor) by the Reichspraesident (Imperial president) and former WW I Fieldmarshal Paul von Hindenburg on the 30th of January 1933.
Hitler´s 1st cabinet was not even a true NSDAP government but the socalled ´government of national concentration´,with Hitler as chancellor and only 2 nazi ministers (Dr. Frick and H. Goering). the majority of ministers were members of the DNVP (deutschnationale volkspartei). because the combined NSDAP and DNVP had no majority (248 of a total 584) in the Reichstag (Imperial diet) they kept governing on the basis of the above mentioned presidential powers of § 48 of the Weimar constitution.
even after the takeover of power (Machtergreifung) and brutal oppression of SPD and KPD election campaigns the nazis were unable to win a majority in the general election of the 5th of March 1933.
Wahlergebnis (election results) vom 5. März 1933
Wahlberechtigte: 44,7 Mill., Wahlbeteiligung: 88,7%
Mill. Stimmen Prozent Abgeordnete
NSDAP 17,3 43,9 288
DNVP 3,1 8,0 52
Zentrum 4,4 11,2 74
BVP 1,1 2,7 18
SPD 7,2 18,3 120
KPD 4,8 12,3 81
---------------------------------
Gesamt 39,3 96,4 647
_____________________
only with the help of the 52 DNVP deputies the nazis won a slim majority in the Reichstag which was used to adopt the socalled ´Ermaechtigungsgesetz`(act of empowerment) of the 21st of March 1933. the KPD (kommunistische partei deutschands) was excluded from the inauguration session of the Reichstag for their alleged incineration of the Reichstag building and the SPD simply didn´t turn up, out of fear.
on the legal basis of § 48 oft he Weimar constitution Hitler was appointed Reichskanzler (Imperial chancellor) by the Reichspraesident (Imperial president) and former WW I Fieldmarshal Paul von Hindenburg on the 30th of January 1933.
Hitler´s 1st cabinet was not even a true NSDAP government but the socalled ´government of national concentration´,with Hitler as chancellor and only 2 nazi ministers (Dr. Frick and H. Goering). the majority of ministers were members of the DNVP (deutschnationale volkspartei). because the combined NSDAP and DNVP had no majority (248 of a total 584) in the Reichstag (Imperial diet) they kept governing on the basis of the above mentioned presidential powers of § 48 of the Weimar constitution.
even after the takeover of power (Machtergreifung) and brutal oppression of SPD and KPD election campaigns the nazis were unable to win a majority in the general election of the 5th of March 1933.
Wahlergebnis (election results) vom 5. März 1933
Wahlberechtigte: 44,7 Mill., Wahlbeteiligung: 88,7%
Mill. Stimmen Prozent Abgeordnete
NSDAP 17,3 43,9 288
DNVP 3,1 8,0 52
Zentrum 4,4 11,2 74
BVP 1,1 2,7 18
SPD 7,2 18,3 120
KPD 4,8 12,3 81
---------------------------------
Gesamt 39,3 96,4 647
_____________________
only with the help of the 52 DNVP deputies the nazis won a slim majority in the Reichstag which was used to adopt the socalled ´Ermaechtigungsgesetz`(act of empowerment) of the 21st of March 1933. the KPD (kommunistische partei deutschands) was excluded from the inauguration session of the Reichstag for their alleged incineration of the Reichstag building and the SPD simply didn´t turn up, out of fear.
I don't let them bother me so much any more. So little of the world has a free press, and you have no way of knowing where these people get their ideas. Therefore, it's a waste of time to debate most of this stuff, much less argue about it.
Freealways, for example, said that all he knew of France was that they "codified" human rights and that he liked the food. Where do you go with that, particularly when the part about human rights isn't true?
When the schools in these countries are so bad, you really have no choice but to take a deep breath and move on to something else.
--Db
Have a good day everybody and trdnut is right about the freedom of speech but occasionally i wouldn't mind some facts not fiction [/B][/QUOTE]
One last thing
Look up Carlyle corporation and find out who is on the board of director and who was on there. Makes some very interesting reading. And I brought as much evidence as any ......
over and out
here is a link
http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
another
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
so I provided some links have fun
One last thing
Look up Carlyle corporation and find out who is on the board of director and who was on there. Makes some very interesting reading. And I brought as much evidence as any ......
over and out
here is a link
http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html
another
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
so I provided some links have fun
I have nthing against Americans ( Just moved here from OK) But I do have a problem with not seing what is there. I provided with links from reputable sources. What do you do?????
If you think that attacking SH ( athough I do belive he should be out ) then you will see later that t is not even anywhere close.
