There are many many ways to deal with the DOM.
There are many many combinations of things that go with the DOM and the T&S.
Lots and lots of "its" out there.
No one knows how I trade. It is very difficult for one person to determine what another person is doing.
The T&S and the DOM are very powerful.
My comments will not ring a bell with very many people. We all know that.
The DOM and T&S are counterintuitive, in my opinion. Just consider that this is a minority view logically speaking.
What makes something right or wrong is never determined by my ways as a standard. How could it ever be?
Someone told the person to whom I commented that in a while if he pursued his work, he would begin to do okay and would survive. He has a theme and it is not counterintuitive and it may work for him sometime in the future as suggested.
He could, on the otherhand, just cut to the chase and use one or more of the many many ways that are successful.
You can see that he doesn't want but one kind of input. That kind of input crossed with the many many ways of being successful is the null set. That is going to be the way it is for anyone who is oriented as you and he are. It is a decision that both of you are making and it is not a decision that comes up most of the time.
How soon do you think a person could catch on to the games being played on DOM if he were watching a fast forward camtasia with stalagtites representing the the 10 volume values of the DOM? What would it look like if the "time to tic change" were showing too? What would it look like if the significant players were ID'ed? This is all drivel to you. Cool; put me on ignore.
