Why Ron Paul is Out: He will stop the New World Order

Maverick74 · Jan 17, 2012

Quote from trefoil:

Nothing that can be refuted?
The whole thing is a mishmash of conspiracy nuttery. I wouldn't know where to begin.
Forget the video. It's true, as it says, that most candidates belong to the CFR. That's because the CFR is harmless and irrelevant, not because they have any power.
A friend I made through a blog I used to keep kept sending me offers to their publication, whichever it is, I don't remember if it's Foreign Affairs or the other one. I know there's two, one of which is the training ground for the future torturers and mass murderers that folks like Trader666 and the rest of the conventional Republicans get all hot & wet over.
No one really cares what's in those magazines. They're the kind of stuff you read when you have insomnia.
Now, point by point:

1 - The CFR, as noted above, doesn't really have any power. It's a debating society for useless academics.
2 - The Bilderbergs? Even the freepers think that's a load of bs. Qaddafi is dead, Mubarak is under house arrest, Myanmar's leaders are making noises that they might actually allow real freedom, and Assad is hanging by a thread. The euro? Dead. Just waiting for the funeral. It's going the way of every other currency union that's ever been tried.
3 - The EU getting together with the African Union and some future Asian Union and some future North American Union? Stupider than stupid. The EU is the only currency union in that list. The African Union is like the Organization of American States, except it does actually run some peacekeeping stuff that does have at least a surface effect. The Asian Union mentioned doesn't actually exist, and neither does the NA Union. Sheesh.
4 - The only place the Amero ever gets mentioned is in these conspiracy jackoff sites. Think of some super-pale fat white boy who splits his time between porno and off-the-wall conspiracy sites. Would you believe some guy who wouldn't know what to do with a nekkid girl if she showed up on his doorstep wet & ready to go? C'mon....
5 - The best explanation I ever heard for JFK's assassination, since of course that one had to be included, was that Oswald was aiming for Connally & missed. Connally was Sec'y of the Navy, which has jurisdiction over the Marines, where Oswald did his service. He wrote to the Navy to get his discharge changed, and was refused, with a form letter signed by Connally. Marina's first reaction to the JFK assassination was that he was shooting for Connally, not JFK. Which explains the uncanny accuracy: he wasn't aiming for JFK, and he missed. Case closed.

In short, a steaming POS. As usual, with conspiracy stupidity.

Trefoil, for once, I actually agree with you. Wow, it took RCG to bring us together.

trefoil · Jan 17, 2012

Quote from Maverick74:

Trefoil, for once, I actually agree with you. Wow, it took RCG to bring us together.

Oh gawd, that means the world really will end.
.
.
.
Will my little stash of gold help, I wonder? (Yes, I do really have one. No lie.)

pspr · Jan 17, 2012

Quote from Maverick74:

Trefoil, for once, I actually agree with you. Wow, it took RCG to bring us together.

Incredible. But, I'm sure that was not only his first logical post but his last since he doesn't have the brain power to ever do that again.

RCG Trader · Jan 17, 2012

Quote from trefoil:

Nothing that can be refuted?
The whole thing is a mishmash of conspiracy nuttery. I wouldn't know where to begin.
Forget the video. It's true, as it says, that most candidates belong to the CFR. That's because the CFR is harmless and irrelevant, not because they have any power.
A friend I made through a blog I used to keep kept sending me offers to their publication, whichever it is, I don't remember if it's Foreign Affairs or the other one. I know there's two, one of which is the training ground for the future torturers and mass murderers that folks like Trader666 and the rest of the conventional Republicans get all hot & wet over.
No one really cares what's in those magazines. They're the kind of stuff you read when you have insomnia.
Now, point by point:

1 - The CFR, as noted above, doesn't really have any power. It's a debating society for useless academics.
2 - The Bilderbergs? Even the freepers think that's a load of bs. Qaddafi is dead, Mubarak is under house arrest, Myanmar's leaders are making noises that they might actually allow real freedom, and Assad is hanging by a thread. The euro? Dead. Just waiting for the funeral. It's going the way of every other currency union that's ever been tried.
3 - The EU getting together with the African Union and some future Asian Union and some future North American Union? Stupider than stupid. The EU is the only currency union in that list. The African Union is like the Organization of American States, except it does actually run some peacekeeping stuff that does have at least a surface effect. The Asian Union mentioned doesn't actually exist, and neither does the NA Union. Sheesh.
4 - The only place the Amero ever gets mentioned is in these conspiracy jackoff sites. Think of some super-pale fat white boy who splits his time between porno and off-the-wall conspiracy sites. Would you believe some guy who wouldn't know what to do with a nekkid girl if she showed up on his doorstep wet & ready to go? C'mon....
5 - The best explanation I ever heard for JFK's assassination, since of course that one had to be included, was that Oswald was aiming for Connally & missed. Connally was Sec'y of the Navy, which has jurisdiction over the Marines, where Oswald did his service. He wrote to the Navy to get his discharge changed, and was refused, with a form letter signed by Connally. Marina's first reaction to the JFK assassination was that he was shooting for Connally, not JFK. Which explains the uncanny accuracy: he wasn't aiming for JFK, and he missed. Case closed.

In short, a steaming POS. As usual, with conspiracy stupidity.

Thank you very much Tref.

BTW, there is one presidential candidate that conspiracy nutters follow the nation over. Guess which one it is?

Trader666 · Jan 18, 2012

What about al-Qaeda then? You defend them a lot. Maybe DAS stands for Douchebag Al-Qaeda Sympathizer.

Quote from DAS Trader:

Nah, I don't speak Farsi.....plus, I respect woman as equals. I guess that means I wouldn't like it much in Israel either.

DemZad · Jan 18, 2012

Quote from trefoil:

Nothing that can be refuted?
The whole thing is a mishmash of conspiracy nuttery. I wouldn't know where to begin.
Forget the video. It's true, as it says, that most candidates belong to the CFR. That's because the CFR is harmless and irrelevant, not because they have any power.

If that were true, then why belong to it?

Quote from trefoil:2 - The Bilderbergs? Even the freepers think that's a load of bs.

Not sure who the freepers are but any organization that cloaks itself in that much secrecy deserves a look. Let's face it, the Bilderberg Group is not exactly transparent.

Quote from trefoil:The euro? Dead. Just waiting for the funeral. It's going the way of every other currency union that's ever been tried.

Indeed, fiat currencies tend not to last too long.

Quote from trefoil:The EU getting together with the African Union and some future Asian Union and some future North American Union? Stupider than stupid. The EU is the only currency union in that list. The African Union is like the Organization of American States, except it does actually run some peacekeeping stuff that does have at least a surface effect. The Asian Union mentioned doesn't actually exist, and neither does the NA Union. Sheesh..

Ok so you think its stupid but how is that a refutation?

Quote from trefoil:4 - The only place the Amero ever gets mentioned is in these conspiracy jackoff sites. Think of some super-pale fat white boy who splits his time between porno and off-the-wall conspiracy sites. Would you believe some guy who wouldn't know what to do with a nekkid girl if she showed up on his doorstep wet & ready to go? C'mon....

Interesting visual/theory but hardly a refutation.

Quote from trefoil:5 - The best explanation I ever heard for JFK's assassination, since of course that one had to be included, was that Oswald was aiming for Connally & missed. Connally was Sec'y of the Navy, which has jurisdiction over the Marines, where Oswald did his service. He wrote to the Navy to get his discharge changed, and was refused, with a form letter signed by Connally. Marina's first reaction to the JFK assassination was that he was shooting for Connally, not JFK. Which explains the uncanny accuracy: he wasn't aiming for JFK, and he missed. Case closed.

Ok this one made me laugh. If it were true, don't you think it would have been a lot easier to get at Connely somewhere else (i.e.: while he was not part of a presidential motorcade)?

Quote from trefoil:In short, a steaming POS. As usual, with conspiracy stupidity.

I wonder if you realize that about 80%of what you typed is opinion, backed by nothing.

DemZad · Jan 18, 2012

Quote from Trader666:

What about al-Qaeda then? You defend them a lot. Maybe DAS stands for Douchebag Al-Qaeda Sympathizer.

Show me one post where I have defended Al Qaeda. You say I do it a lot so this should take you no time at all.

Also, since you like to find hidden meanings in user names, should I assume that you are Satan?

Trader666 · Jan 18, 2012

One post? Your unwavering support of that "blowback" horseshit defends al-Qaeda because it in effect blames America for acts of the psychotic Islamofascist founder and late head of al-Qaeda.

I, on the other hand, unwaveringly support the United States which some in Iran (that you also defend) call the "Great Satan" so maybe you should assume that.

Quote from DAS Trader:

Show me one post where I have defended Al Qaeda. You say I do it a lot so this should take you no time at all.

Also, since you like to find hidden meanings in user names, should I assume that you are Satan?

DemZad · Jan 18, 2012

Quote from Trader666:

One post? Your unwavering support of that "blowback" horseshit defends al-Qaeda because it in effect blames America for acts of the psychotic Islamofascist founder and late head of al-Qaeda.

I see. So you could not find a single post where I "defended Al Qaeda". Thank you. If you have issues with the CIA then take it up with the CIA; they coined the term blowback, not me. Until someone smarter comes along with an explanation that supersedes what our top spy agency has come up with, I believe I'll continue to go with it. I hope that's ok with you Trader666.

Quote from Trader666:I, on the other hand, unwaveringly support the United States which some in Iran (that you also defend) call the "Great Satan" so maybe you should assume that.

Let's see, Iran has been accused by Israel and the US of seeking to develop nuclear weapons. To date, there is no concrete evidence of this. Did I just defend Iran?

Trader666 · Jan 18, 2012

Let's see the CIA report you're talking about, Douchebag Al-Qaeda Sympathizer. Blaming America for bin Laden's actions is absolutely defending al-Quada, not to mention it's absurd on its face which you're too stupid to see.

Writing "in some ways we [the U.S.] are worse than Iran" is not defending Iran? Doubling down on it isn't defending Iran?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3412650#post3412650

How about this moronic post where you want to see "the American report for comparison?" As a U.S. citizen and having lived in the United States, don't you know enough about the Unites States to make a comparison without a report?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3412678#post3412678

Quote from DAS Trader:

I see. So you could not find a single post where I "defended Al Qaeda". Thank you. If you have issues with the CIA then take it up with the CIA; they coined the term blowback, not me. Until someone smarter comes along with an explanation that supersedes what our top spy agency has come up with, I believe I'll continue to go with it. I hope that's ok with you Trader666.

Let's see, Iran has been accused by Israel and the US of seeking to develop nuclear weapons. To date, there is no concrete evidence of this. Did I just defend Iran?