Why Reported Inflation Seems Different Than Reality

Quote from Mav88:

Flat to negative for most, just as I thought, Ricter is full of crap EVEN with the bogus inflation indicator
More...
You fucked up bad. "Adjusted for inflation?" as a retort to my assertion about wages over costs. And yet here you're believing the chart but with the excuse, "for most". LOL.
 
Ricter logic.... inflation is NOT a problem because wages are rising, but never mind that other things may be rising faster
 
Quote from Ricter:

You fucked up bad. "Adjusted for inflation?" as a retort to my assertion about wages over costs. And yet here you're believing the chart but with the excuse, "for most". LOL.
More...

your assertions, experience, etc. are worthless, but in any event you made no such assertion here in this thread
 
Quote from Ricter:

It supports my experience, that wages are inflating faster than expenses.
More...
I don't see expenses or inflation in your chart.
 
Quote from Mav88:

Ricter logic.... inflation is NOT a problem because wages are rising, but never mind that other things may be rising faster
More...
Please attempt to understand my assertion before you try to counter it. But you do understand, don't you? revealed by your "for most" qualifier.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Please attempt to understand my assertion before you try to counter it. But you do understand, don't you? revealed by your "for most" qualifier.
More...

asserting that inflation is a problem only when adjusted wages fall for the top 5th is pretty dumb, they derive a lot of income from portfolios that may rise with inflation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top