Quote from spindr0:
Your emotional reaction to gains and losses doesn't tempt fate. You tempt fate by subjecting yourself to more risk than you can manage/tolerate.
People brag because they're either bullshit artists or they're looking for approval. People increase their size because they're either too stupid to know better or they know what they're doing and can manage the risk.
Discipline involves using your intellectual abilities to control your emotional disabilities.
I like these two posts - this one above and the first post.
This leads us to the point of the "psychology" sub-forum, which is to help the trader solve those psychological problems that keep him from being profitable. After trying to do so for over ten years, the only solution I found was to switch to what is covered by this other sub-forum - "Automated Trading".
I never learned to control my emotions enough to be profitable, despite trying for over 10 years. On top of it, while you're trying to learn it, you need to invest real money, because your emotions are not going to be the same whether you're paper trading or trading real money.
Also, the psychological factor (not applying stoplosses, other rules and so on), will keep you from focusing on whether you have a strategy that works or not. In other words, you will never know whether it's your psychology that's keeping you from making money, or if you don't have a winning strategy.
Automated trading allows you to assume, that whatever strategy you have, it will consist of fixed and univocal parameters and rules and that you will apply them without exceptions, getting rid of the psychological aspect altogether. But before starting it, you also make sure that your strategy works, by previously back-testing it.
Automated trading, preceded by strategy back testing, made me profitable overnight. Find what works, and use it.
You can do it in much less time than learning to control your emotions, and at zero expense, because your automated system doesn't see any difference between paper trading and real trading, so you can forward test it (live, including commissions, spread, slippage costs) as long as you want (besides being able to back-test it of course).
But an important point is full automation, because for almost a whole year I managed to still lose money with discretionary trading while the automated system was making money.
The difference it made for me is that with discretionary trading I was losing money every single month for over ten years (for a total of 50,000 dollars), and when I finally finished my automated system, I was doubling my money every month for a few months, then also lost everything twice due to adding some discretionary trading (but I also spent part of it, before losing everything). Anyway, the system made money, while I lost it. So I could say that it made money for a whole year. Now I applied no money management so I went through a drawdown and maybe I would have lost everything also without any discretionary trading...
Anyway, now I am back WITH money management and WITHOUT ANY discretionary trading, and have been fully automated for 35 days (about 24 trading days). I still went through a bad drawdown time BUT all that happened is that I didn't make any money for two weeks (I am trading several systems at once). Only made like 75% so far, but I was a bit unlucky. Anyway I took whatever losses came, without interfering with it. I don't even have the quotes page. I have no idea what is going on in the markets. I just turn it on and off once a day.
The only disadvantage is the reason why I postponed it for so long - it's a lot of work. It's years and years of work. Instead, discretionary trading is effortless and exciting. This is boring (and efficient). Discretionary trading is certainly much more fun and addictive. Well, anyway, it's all up to you. In my opinion automated trading is the only way to go.